4 weeks early so she wouldn't get stretchmarks awww poor baby, what's the rush celebs have kids and then leave them with the nanny, what's the point of having kids if someone else is gonna raise your child?
2006-09-09 08:47:24 · 18 answers · asked by Pink Butterfly 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Ok batmansgirl what do I have to gain from my question your an idiot and obviously you have never had kids because you can get stretchmarks at anytime. It was in the news she had a girl and named her Jaylin ( I don't know if I spelt that right )
2006-09-09 09:07:04 · update #1
Yup, It's true, I saw it too. She had her Friday via c-cection and named her Jailynn she took part of her moms name and part of her dads name. I can't stand her she is the poster child for white trash, besides like someone else said the kids are better off w/the nanny. Hey anyone wanna take bets on when she will get pregnant again lol.
2006-09-09 09:34:21 · answer #1 · answered by **Jellybean princess** 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
From what I have heard, she was due the middle of September which is next week, and since her son's b-day is next week, she probably didn't want the 2 birthdays so close together. No doctor would take a baby a month early unless there were complications.
2006-09-09 16:39:25 · answer #2 · answered by Jaded 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I didn't even know she had the baby, it probably sounds horrible but in this case I think the kid is better off with the nanny.
2006-09-09 16:14:30 · answer #3 · answered by sparky 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
With Britney I think the baby is better off with the nanny.
2006-09-09 15:49:58 · answer #4 · answered by DawnDavenport 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
i agree with gmonte33 beside britney is i moron sad thing is i used to like her
With Britney I think the baby is better off with the nanny
2006-09-09 17:08:50 · answer #5 · answered by question men 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no where in the news does it say that she had the second one. she was scheduled to have a c section one week before the first birthday of her first child. any idiot knows that stretch marks come way before the last month of pregnancy. quit being jealous and making up lies
2006-09-09 15:59:15 · answer #6 · answered by thelogicalferret 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Celebrities have kids for two reasons:
1.They get to have sex!
2.PRESS COVERAGE!
2006-09-09 15:54:59 · answer #7 · answered by ♫♪♫TAY-LUR♫♪♫ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes it is true. poor child i bet it wanted another month inside the womb before it had to meet it sponging father.
2006-09-09 15:58:18 · answer #8 · answered by shadownurse 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
some celebs shouldnt reproduce in the 1st place
2006-09-09 15:54:16 · answer #9 · answered by JJ 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
She did? What did she have, girl or boy? I can't find any news on the internet. Are you sure?
2006-09-09 16:01:46 · answer #10 · answered by redtulip 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋