2006-09-09 08:22:40 · 23 answers · asked by gasha 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
When one side has finally secured control of the country. The Sunnis are probably not got to be victorious. The Shiites have strong Iranian backing and Sadr City is full of Shiite militia biding their time until the US finally leaves.
Of course, we don't plan on leaving before 2008, so things won't be calming down in Iraq anytime soon.
2006-09-09 08:28:04 · answer #1 · answered by KERMIT M 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well let's see, The US declared it's independence in 1776 but didn't have independence granted until 1783. So I suspect it will be awhile. Even after the civil war it took time for things to calm down. I don't see where Iraq will be too much different.
2006-09-09 08:27:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Adam B, Libertarianism isn't a foul ingredient contained in the Republican social gathering. The Libertarian social gathering is stuffed with disgruntled Republicans. back to the question, Ron Paul replaced into saved out because he represented a coverage that replaced into very classic and extremely smart that replaced into in accordance with suggestion of the Founders of u . s . a ., like no entanglements in overseas alliances, no significant banks that replaced into strongly cautioned with the help of Jefferson, no "massive brother" administration that Benjamin Franklin hostile, and no rules that were are stated contained in the structure. The media is amazingly biased, and surely attraction themselves to politicians that violate the structure, and those who screw the persons. no longer too ignore, Ron Paul is an economist, he in all probability knew were going to enter a heavy recession in view that 2002, and has inspired a overseas coverage the position we do not deliver adult men into quagmires like Iraq, no longer to bypass to conflict so armed forces businesses improve wealthy, and a society it is in accordance with sound money like gold/silver, a society the position States have more desirable rights, and the authorities might want to proceed to be small and clear.
2016-11-25 22:20:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
3 years 4 months
2006-09-09 08:24:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
10 times never
2006-09-12 23:17:19 · answer #5 · answered by Roberto 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it will never calm down until the oil runs out.
2006-09-09 23:40:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It will take about 200,000,000 metric tons of crude oil. And in the meantime the politicians will tell you they really care about the people of Iraq. They will tell you they have something they want to export - democracy, good values, compassion towards others, and apple pie. Starting to wear a bit thin, the crust on that apple pie, yes ?
2006-09-09 08:34:54 · answer #7 · answered by democracynow 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I think it will be like taht for years to come. As soon as the troops leave I suspect there might be a civil war.
2006-09-09 08:25:16 · answer #8 · answered by Gavin T 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
iraq is ruined now,it will never calm down.
2006-09-09 08:25:27 · answer #9 · answered by ♥Scottish♥Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ♥Fairy♥ 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
this is the start of the 1000 year war so dont hold your breath. Its going to be them or us fight to the death.
2006-09-09 08:40:30 · answer #10 · answered by Rizzo 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋