I DID NOT SEE THE TAPE...BUT HE KNEW HE COULD DIE AT ANY TIME !!!
2006-09-09 08:57:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by ♥ NIKKI .♥ 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
There was an on-air official police statement broadcast around Australia, The officer clearly stated, Steve irwin did not threaten the animal it was a freak accident,
As all his crew mates have said, he never agitated the stingray..
I stand right here in Australia, Defending Steves name, Because he can't, And all those heartless cold miserable people continue to bag him , Without knowing that he has children, and becasue he was a public figure this is going to live with them for the rest of their lifes!!!
God bless u xx
2006-09-09 12:59:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Another conspiracy theory? What a shocker.
I do have it on good authority, however, that as well as taunting that stingray, Steve Irwin was one of the masterminds behind 9/11.
2006-09-09 08:31:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Steve was about to expose the "truth" about 9/11 so the CIA hired that stingray (a democrate, of course) to take him out.
2006-09-09 12:20:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
In all honesty, I say it doesn't really matter...he's gone now and it doesn't really matter whether he agitated it or not. What good is it really gonna do someone to think real hard and ponder whether or not he made it angry before the stingray stung him?? It's certainly not gonna bring him back! These people need to stop putting pointless questions into other people's minds and get them to start thinking about things that do matter!
2006-09-09 08:19:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I heard on larry king, he went close to the stingray to see it, then swam above it and that is when the stingray attacked. he was only defending himself. Steve was in the stingrays natural terriorty. he knew the risks and he took them anyway. I do not see how he can take them risks when he has a family. He was not one, he had to think about his family and his 2 young kids and he obviously liked his job better.
2006-09-09 08:20:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I dont know but the police reported that he did not agitate the stingray after they saw the tape.
2006-09-09 08:18:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by CommonRider 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, that's gotta be it!! The stingray was conspiring with the camera man and crew to kill poor Steve. It all makes sense now!
2006-09-09 08:21:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I don't believe Stave did anything to agitate the stingray I feel it was just a unfortuante accident that ended it tradgedy..
2006-09-11 11:30:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by lilmommy1824 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
You persons are between a number of the coldest, heartless people i've got ever had the dipleasure to pay attention too! Steve Irwin did plenty for his u . s . a ., and the planet. in spite of what he did in the path of his occupation, ought to have no longer something to do together with his loss of existence! Has it occured to you that his infants would be raised devoid of daddy. That as youthful as they are, they are going to in all hazard have little or no, if any reminiscence of him what so ever? You call that poetic justice? I call it heartbreaking. they are going to in no way see him, hug him, argue with him, or have the prospect to have their father ever lower back. loss of existence isn't poetic justice. this is only permenent. i've got in no way seen absolutely everyone so indiffrent and vicious relating to the loss of existence of yet another individual in my existence. while you contemplate on that, shop this in ideas. Karma is a humorous element. while you spit your judgmental rubbish, somebody someplace is conserving song of your words, and cruelty. i'm hoping while the time comes, you will comprehend only what your words have led to. i'm hoping that his kin is physically powerful sufficient to pass on, i want them each and all of the stable success and love i will bestow.
2016-12-15 05:16:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Either way, the stingray had attacked him in a fatal location.
2006-09-09 08:20:05
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋