I do believe in the concept of reparation, however, there are some mitigating factors:
1. We haven't had legal slavery in this country for over 140 years now. While you may not consider this a long time, with an average "generation" of thirty years, that would put four, and almost five generations since slavery. That IS a long time.
2. Reparation for slavery is a very different issue from reparation for segregation or "current forms of institutional racism." Slavery is a forced state of existence, regardless of your "race." While I believe in a more enlightened philosophy that excludes racism, there is no crime in being racist. All of us are, to some degree, predjudiced. Even if one could claim with complete honesty (and it would be few of us, if any at all) not to be racially predjudiced, we are still predjudiced based on gender, religion, political persuasion, and even the clothes someone wears. A white man killing another man is murder, which is a crime. This holds true regardless of whether or not the victim is white or black. However, a white man refusing a hire a black man, or disliking him, is not a crime. There is a great difference between forced and voluntary relationships, and it is one which the people of America very seldom acknowledge, but which makes a tremendous difference when it comes to law (although, unfortunately, even our laws do not reflect it). To give one example of many, of how this might go wrong, consider the current OEO requirements. An employer has to hire x number of blacks, hispanics, and women. But let's say that the employer is a technology-based company that does few if any sales to the end user. Being in that field myself, I can say that the number of competent males outnumbers females at probably four to one. This is not sexism, it is a simple fact. But if the employer is required to hire equal numbers of men and women, his business is in extreme jeapardy. There may not be enough competent women to be hired, and so he must hire incompetent women and attempt to train them (assuming that they even want to learn what he has to teach), which will drive his employment costs through the roof.
3. Many US citizens today had few or no ancestors responsible for slavery. My ancestors all came over (that I know of) after the civil war. They were dirt poor - as poor as descendants of slavery living in the projects today, and clawed their way up from nothing, without welfare or government handouts. Why should we be responsible for what neither we nor our ancestors perpetrated, to distant relatives of those who were abused on the same lands on which we currently live?
4. What about all those who died to bring about an end to slavery? At the end of the Civil War, the white population was every bit as badly off as the black one, if not moreso, from a financial standpoint. The average person's resources were completely depleted, and all the able-bodied men had been fighting (and many of them dying) in war. Should the descendants of the freed slaves have to pay reparations for the Northern soldiers who died believing that by doing so, they were creating a free world for people of all races?
5. You have said that the poor are still unable to overcome the consequences of slavery. What you forget is that it is not just the descendants of slaves who are poor. Personally, I was not born into wealth. Though I was not born with nothing, when I was young my father became unemployed, and my mother worked to support the family. We lived on a small farm, drove older vehicles, and had little property of any real value. For some time after I moved out, though in a rural area, I could not afford a vehicle, and so rode a bicycle seven miles each way to do a telemarketing job. I now own a small business and STILL can't afford the bills. My parents are broke and have no savings or retirement, and I expect that my mother will have to work until the day she dies. I don't expect anyone else to pay my bills, or those of my parents as they age. They may get a small amount of social security, but it's barely enough to rent a small apartment, let alone support their little farm. Around here (in upper Appalachia), this is an average scenario. Of the black people I know, they are no worse off than anyone else.
In conclusion, after this amount of time, and so much immigration, it is no longer possible to provide further reparations for those negatively effected by slavery in an honest and fair way. Whites and blacks alike, along with hispanics, orientals, and everybody else, have had to work hard for generations to take care of themselves and their families. At this point, any attempt at reparations for slavery would be impractical, and do more harm than good.
P.S. One place where reparations SHOULD be made is in the case of the Native Americans. They are still being held against their will on small and difficult plots of ground. They need to be given the option of either being integrated into society, or moved to far better and more plentiful ground. While the Indian wars were certainly not all the fault of the USA, this country was as much to blame as the Indians. Forget neither our wars of conquest on their territory or our blatant lies to them, or their cruelty and deceipt on so many occasions, in many cases slaughtering large numbers of women and children, often in barbarous and gruesome ways. Each tribe needs to be accounted for individually (in a "whose fault was it?" way). and reparations made accordingly. All should be given the choices of integration or relocation, and some should be given physical and financial reparations as well. While many citizens of the US were not responsible for what was done to them so long ago, they are still being held against their will - a very different scenario from the descendants of black slaves.
2006-09-09 08:49:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Nathan 3
·
2⤊
0⤋