http://www.democrats.org/page/petition/pathto911/
2006-09-09 07:58:16 · 18 answers · asked by Super Shiraz 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think we are smart enough on our own to figure out the DOCU from the DRAMA.
I think because of there whining they will probably lose the election.
How could President Clinton's reputation be any worse than it is already.
2006-09-09 08:02:50 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Well what side of the issue were you on when Miramax, also a Disney subsidiary, would not release Fahrenheit 9-11 which did selectively tell facts in a juxtaposition that would expose some lies, crimes, and incompetency of the Dumbya Coup, but did not just fabricate events as your fav fantasy film does? Dumbya REALLY DID sit on his butt and did his remedial readin' of My Pet Goat when some might expect something different. Do you doubt that? Down with Dictator Dumbya!!!
2006-09-09 08:23:49 · answer #2 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think that the propaganda piece, "Path to 9/11" should be shown in it's entirety AFTER the November elections. It is obvious that this cheesy manipulated pile of crap was created and funded by the the right-wing to sway the electorate (not all that sophisticated to begin with) to vote for candidates who support the Bush regime's rape of America. That ABC would participate in such a sham seems to indicate that they have either been intimidated or infiltrated by the fascist elements trying to totally control America for their own benefit.
2006-09-09 12:14:12 · answer #3 · answered by iknowtruthismine 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Is this like when some conservatives had the made-for-tv movie about Reagan pulled? I think you're just being a hypocrite. Besides, I think the Democrats are upset at the way Clinton is portrayed as having allegedly let bin Laden go because he was preoccupied with Lewinsky. Hey, are you upset that Bush said he wanted bin Laden "dead or alive" then went on to say he doesn't think about bin Laden anymore? Are you upset that Bush let bin Laden slip away so the PNAC group could invade a country that all evidence suggests had nothing to do with 9/11? Are you upset that we pulled up troops to go after Saddam, bin Laden's known secular enemy?
2006-09-09 08:15:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Isn't is funny. When CBS wanted to air a "Docu-Drama" that was not favorable to Ronald Reagan the Republicans had not problem with censorship when they pressured CBS to pull it. Now that it's the Democrats trying to stop something critical of Bill Clinton and suddenly the Republicans are all about free speech.
Personally I think this 9/11 program is crap and as someone who lost a good friend in the South Tower I think it's offensive. However, I also think ABC should air it and let the American Public see it for the Karl Rove propaganda it is.
2006-09-09 08:10:09 · answer #5 · answered by arvis3 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Did you see my question? I saw your link and I just don't understand why the Republican website doesn't do the same thing? It doesn't even mention this! I most definitely think they not only tried to censor ABC but did. Unless the Republicans start going at the Democrats tit for tat, they're going to have problems. You must admit that the Democrats seem to fight harder for this sort of thing than we do.
2006-09-09 08:03:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Typical
2006-09-09 08:34:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gee... I don't know... they are criticizing Clinton for an event that NEVER HAPPENED... must be that damn "liberal media" again!!! They distorted the truth - they (ABC) deserves to be censured. There is a fine line between "conflating" events and "distorting" events and ABC has distorted the events. ABC is even thinking about cancelling showing the series - feelings about 9/11 are still pretty raw. My wife's oldest son was in NYC on that day and was almost assigned by his work to the WTC that day. Dramatization of an event is fair play - LYING about it is NOT.
2006-09-09 08:05:18 · answer #8 · answered by Paul H 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Typical hypocrisy by the dems. Business as usual for them.
It's more about the lies and lack of integrity to protect the legacy of the Clinton years.
They run this party, still.
I dread the day and cannot stand to hear the cries of citizens when these idiots are re-elected and control Congress again.
It will, of course, be a love-fest by the media and the dems have to control the media to get approval for their agenda .
2006-09-09 08:08:21 · answer #9 · answered by randyrich 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I can completely see their point! I mean, I had completely forgotten that Clinton had disgraced the oval office, purjured himself, gotten disbarred, committed rape and murder--deployed the military 44 times in eight years, bombed an asprin factory in the Sudan all to divert attention away from his crimes......and if ABC hadn't "reminded" America - he may have gone down as a great president
2006-09-09 08:11:31 · answer #10 · answered by Cherie 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I don't think its censorship. I mean, its not like the Republicans were trying to pull the made for tv movie on Reagan on CBS. Oh wait, they did do that. I think there is a legitimate case for why this shouldn't be aired on ABC as is. But I'm not going to go into that, do your own research, find your own answers, and thanks for the two points.
2006-09-09 08:13:35 · answer #11 · answered by Jay 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋