See story: http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2006/sep/09/in_new_letter_clintons_lawyer_demands_abc_yank_film
It is clear that Bill Clinton, nor his lawyers have even seen the ABC 9/11 movie. How can they be so adamant about the accuracy of the movie? Let's face it, when was ABC ever antagonistic toward Bill Clinton, so it's not likely they are out to get him either. We know that there were things about Bill Clinton that didn't even get touched on by the Commission, that doesn't mean they didn't happen. So, why doesn't the public deserve to hear the full story?
2006-09-09 07:27:41 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
1. It would cause his so-called legacy to crumble.
2. The dems want all the blame heaped on President Bush to prevent any revelation of the fact that they are do-nothings.
Congrats to the dems on trampling the First Amendment under foot by threatening to take away ABC's broadcast license. So much for free speech.
2006-09-09 07:36:41 · answer #1 · answered by Albannach 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Actually, Clinton did see the movie. He, along with others, saw a pre-screening of it. As with most movies about 9/11 and who is to blame, there have been reported inaccuracies. The democrats want to blame the republicans, the republicans want to blame the democrats. The only ones truly at fault are the terrorists, let's move on.
2006-09-09 14:37:01 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think that the propaganda piece, "Path to 9/11" should be shown in it's entirety AFTER the November elections. It is obvious that this cheesy manipulated pile of crap was created and funded by the the right-wing to sway the electorate (not all that sophisticated to begin with) to vote for candidates who support the Bush regime's rape of America. That ABC would participate in such a sham seems to indicate that they have either been intimidated or infiltrated by the fascist elements trying to totally control America for their own benefit.
2006-09-09 19:15:12 · answer #3 · answered by iknowtruthismine 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well... it doesn't mean they did happen either?
and if it didn't happen, then it's not PART OF THE FULL STORY...
it seems that you assume that just because Clinton is upset, that it's automatically the truth?
what if, IMAGINE THIS, it actually is false? do we deserve to hear the false story?
so far I have heard that this movie was backed up by one very low level officer of the Clinton admin.... while it's been denied by pretty much everyone else that had anything to do with the admin.
what are the odds that the one person is telling the truth and everyone else is lying?... it's possible... just not very likely..
ABC didn't make the drama, they just purchased it to show it... those who did make it are clearly anti-Clinton...
2006-09-09 15:27:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
absolutly,
He wants to be seen as the peace time president, not the president that stalled a war, and let thousands of americans die on 9/11
2006-09-09 14:46:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bill is a legend in his own mind.
2006-09-09 14:40:12 · answer #6 · answered by EW 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
like the first answer said he is not a bad guy just never did anything. he was always to afraid of a bad public rating, so he stayed neutral.
2006-09-09 14:34:49 · answer #7 · answered by native 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Yes, i don't know why he is trying, everyone knows the truth, Bill was not a bad guy, it is just, he NEVER did anything
2006-09-09 14:31:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Yes, how I don.t miss "Slick Willie". Good to know he is still campaigning.
2006-09-09 14:33:02 · answer #9 · answered by Bawney 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋