could some puople answer the 3questions i would like to hear the different opinions
2006-09-09 06:12:48 · 6 answers · asked by Exclusive [♥] 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
No, it's not bunk. (unless you hear it from Dan Rather, Michael Moore, Spike Lee, Hillary Clinton's "Herstory" or ABC)
What did he mean about what?
Agree with what?
2006-09-09 06:17:58 · answer #1 · answered by Mom of One in Wisconsin 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. History is nothing more than the lies everyone agrees to. He is talking about written and taught history, not the actual event history itself.
Bush doesn't know much, but he knows that perceived history is much more powerful than the true history.
2006-09-09 13:15:56 · answer #2 · answered by Paladin 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
History is not bunk , we learn from history not to repeat . But do we learn . History is what has past before .
2006-09-09 13:33:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This must be public education at work. You need to phrase your question in a manner that others can understand what your looking for.
2006-09-09 13:16:46 · answer #4 · answered by rikv77 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This sounds like a homework question.
2006-09-09 14:38:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Very clear questions. Poor thing, you are so confused.
2006-09-09 13:16:50 · answer #6 · answered by pelister56 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋