I thought it was good and cool.
2006-09-09 06:05:02 · 17 answers · asked by Luke 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Which one? 1933 was the best. 1976 was good. 2005 was not quite a good as the original and it was too long
2006-09-09 06:15:43 · answer #1 · answered by rules27 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that it was a good one-time theater experience, I wouldn't see it again, or buy the DVD, as it was 3 hours long, but I think to experience the massiveness that is King Kong and the feeling of being on top of a skyscraper with him, you have to see it on the big screen at least once.
Or maybe a really big TV will work?
2006-09-09 13:08:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it was good; normally I don't like these kind of monster movies because I think they're cheesy, but this one actually had a story behind, other than just the monster eating people. Kong actually develops friendship with a character, and one can't help but to sympathesize with him at the end... Watch it whether you like monster movies, or even romantic movies, with a bit of humor as well. Have fun!
2006-09-09 13:10:55 · answer #3 · answered by A sunny day 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's great. It has nice sceneries, it has romance, action, comedy meshed together nicely. And the bond between king kong and the leading actress is just simply touching...
2006-09-09 13:16:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thought it was great. It's definitely not going to challenge for an Oscar, but the movie was very fun, intense at times, and just a pleasure to watch.
2006-09-09 13:09:38 · answer #5 · answered by crazz_32 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
king kong is the best movie ever saw it on opening nite
2006-09-09 13:37:44 · answer #6 · answered by *Kat* 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was ok, it just seemed so done. I know the effects were amazing, but the story has already been told and used as entertainment for so long that I didn't really enjoy the film (content wise). Art wise, yes, amazing.
2006-09-09 13:07:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Peter Jackson's remake? It went on a bit long, but it was really good.
The studio was unhappy, as it "only" grossed $567M worldwide
2006-09-09 13:15:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thought it was good, but I was a little disappointed.
2006-09-09 13:11:24 · answer #9 · answered by Paul K 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
too me ,very good ,it could of been better if you didnt have 2 wait almost till the end to see him!
2006-09-09 13:11:09 · answer #10 · answered by BIGBEUTIFULL_LATINA 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋