2006-09-09 06:01:50 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes, I thought this movie was blaming Clinton. I probably could have worded the question better.
2006-09-09 06:07:05 · update #1
Was not against Clinton....government inability to protect our children while occupying the world.
2006-09-09 06:05:21 · answer #1 · answered by pelister56 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sorry, but I have to ask a question to answer your question. Do you know of any documentary Michael Moore has done that would be against any Democrat including Mr. Clinton?
2006-09-09 06:03:50 · answer #2 · answered by EW 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
properly the difficulty remember is far less offensive and extra univerasal than his previous difficulty remember so it rather is clever they're going to provide psotove comments. all of us agree that ill people want help and that well-being care in this us of a is inbelivable so it rather deosnt play occasion lines
2016-11-06 23:42:59 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bowling for Columbine was anti gun, Anti Republican film. Michael Moore is even fired by respected members of his own party. How could any person who claims to be proudly from the left support any crap this idiot spues.
"In 1986, because of his growing reputation as a hotshot leftwing journalist, Moore was hired as editor of the San Francisco-based socialist magazine Mother Jones, beating out its Managing Editor David Talbot (who later founded and continues to edit the left webzine Salon.com). Four months later the magazine fired Moore. Adam Hochschild, chairman of the foundation that owns Mother Jones, described Moore as "arbitrary; he was suspicious; he was unavailable." Moore's high-handed bullying and authoritarian arrogance had alienated most staff members. And Moore had censored a piece by veteran left writer Paul Berman, rejecting it because it mildly criticized the human rights record of Nicaragua's Sandinista dictatorship. One of America's farthest left magazines fired Michael Moore because, among other reasons, he was too far left for it.
Using what have become his familiar tactics, Moore responded by staging a media-grabbing public demonstration, by going on a Bay Area radio show to accuse Berman (as MacFarquhar described) "of being a traitor to the left and giving aid and comfort to [President Ronald] Reagan," and by suing Mother Jones for $2 million. Moore eventually pocketed $58,000 from its tax-exempt Foundation for National Progress, which became seed money for his first "documentary," Roger & Me, an agitprop assault on General Motors, its chief executive Roger Smith and its recent worker layoffs in Flint.
After Moore was fired by Mother Jones he was rescued from near-destitution by another critic of GM, Ralph Nader, author of the seminal bible of anti-business consumer activism Unsafe At Any Speed. Nader paid Moore to edit a media-criticizing newsletter. Moore soon lost this job too. The reason, according to Nader, is that Moore spent most of his time away in Flint instead of writing the newsletter. According to Moore (who routinely trashes those who disagree with him) Nader was jealous that a publisher had paid Moore an advance of almost $50,000 for a book (that in the end Moore never completed) about General Motors."
How could anyone believe or support any of this idiots ideologies. They are all slanted even further left than most liberals on this site would dare to go.
2006-09-09 06:21:32 · answer #4 · answered by fire_side_2003 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think we should be more concerned with the focal point of hte documentary, the gun-part. Let's not make it more political than he already has. There's some heart under all the political sludge.
2006-09-09 06:05:10 · answer #5 · answered by Tofu Jesus 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
and just who was to blame? open your eyes to the truth. Clinton was a crook. I am still waiting for answers to the mark rich pardon, and the pardon of his family member for drug charges.
2006-09-09 07:13:13 · answer #6 · answered by Work In Progress 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't know.
But where is that Bank that will give you a free shotgun for opening an account?
I could use a free shotgun.
Go big Red Go
2006-09-09 06:09:40 · answer #7 · answered by 43 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, It was against the right to own firearms.
He hates America.
He's a rich guy who lives in a mansion and goes around dirty and acts like a poor guy.
Pure Hypocrite.
2006-09-09 06:06:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
he blames everyone, but he's nonpartisan. although he blames clinton, he doesn't endorse anyone, does he?
btw he's making a new movie... go here for more info:
http://la-louche.blogspot.com
2006-09-09 08:47:29 · answer #9 · answered by oohaybel 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Does it matter? Will anything ever change?
Liberal or Conservative in "power", the REAL power lies with the very rich. And those who control Other People's Money.
2006-09-09 06:04:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋