They seem to be up his butt all the time. And making excuses for him.
2006-09-09 05:16:41 · 22 answers · asked by Ah Ha 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I mean, to run Iraq, be the dictator.
2006-09-09 05:19:43 · update #1
no, they want him to be nominated on the DNC presidental ticket
2006-09-09 05:22:42 · answer #1 · answered by shut up dummy 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No.
Why does a foreign affair turn into partisan BS? I believe that both cons and libs want Iraq to be a success. The problem here is that the plan that is Not Working is not being re-examined. Saddam would not be a good solution and I think that is really just a partisan attack. Our handling of the war needs to be fixed, but not by a "party" by our government. Remember that our leaders are supposed to lead our country not their personal agendas.
2006-09-09 05:25:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do the conservatives want Iraq in a civil war? It looks like the conservative are doing everything possible to ruin Iraq.
Perhaps the best thing for this mess would be to let Saddam go. If the Iraqis think that he is the only person who can hold the country together then fine. Its better than the alternative.
2006-09-09 05:20:30 · answer #3 · answered by Dr. D 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Saddam is dangerous and a bad man at least for America. I don't support going into Iraq JUST to take him out as you can see the price for doing that is too high. But since we are already paying the price and have already gone in, No. Saddam is an evil person and putting him behind bars is a good thing. It just wasn't worth the cost.
2006-09-09 05:23:59 · answer #4 · answered by choyryu 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You sound like Rush Limbaugh on a bad day. And no. this is not meant as a compliment. If Saddam harbored terrorists attacking Israel then why wasn't he Israels difficulty? Israel had no hardship taking concerns into their own hands whilst they bombed Iraq's nuclear facility 20 years in the past. as far because of the fact the gassing of the Kurds, we regarded any opposite direction whilst it got here approximately. Why are we swiftly outraged?
2016-12-18 07:28:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He never left Iraq.
Liberals do not want a far right wing conservative dictator like Saddam Hussein back in power.
Liberals prefer that Iraq have a good, decent, honest, liberal Democratic Party like the USA has.
2006-09-09 05:17:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
What a whooper, you're just like your buddys on Answers, when you can't even think of a real question, you make one up, no one has even been discussing Saddam, we know where he is and don't care if he rots.
Now you and your """""" and '''' can get on with choosing each best other for your great intellectual capacity and always agreeing. Your questions are not for honest debate but to find others exactly like yourself. It shows on your profiles.
2006-09-09 15:31:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iraq People want to put him as American Presidential Candidate to remove WMD stored at USA.
2006-09-09 05:25:51 · answer #8 · answered by adraya 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is running Iraq, didn't you know? This whole trial and elected Parliament is just a charade. And that's just where I want him to be. I want him to plan another terrorist attack on the US just like the one he did on 9/11.
2006-09-09 10:22:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is still there as far as I know.
And godisdead is correct, dictators of every stripe keep the populance in line.
Some poeople think freedom gives them the right to go crazy killing everyone else who does not believe as they do..
2006-09-09 05:22:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I hate to tell ya, Saddam kept the sectarian killing to a stalemate. We've not done such a good a job
2006-09-09 05:22:12 · answer #11 · answered by jpknute1 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋