English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

28 answers

and why do you say, "were" close? You don't think there is still a connection?

2006-09-09 04:31:30 · answer #1 · answered by Shades of Gray 3 · 0 1

various contributors of the Bush kin are traders in the Carlyle team, a protection contractor and funding fund with multiple pursuits in the middle East, run by way of former Reagan administration Secretary of protection Frank Carlucci.[3] The media mentioned that former President George H. W. Bush attended an funding assembly on the Washington, D.C. Ritz-Carlton inn on September 10, 2001 and specifically a gathering with Shafiq bin encumbered, representing joint pursuits of the Saudi Binladin team and Carlyle.[4] (Bush did no longer attend the morning of 11th of September, in spite of the fact that this is been alleged that the assembly occurred in the time of the 9/11 terrorist assaults. Former Secretary of State James Baker replaced into cutting-edge, alongside with Carlucci.[4]) The Carlyle and Binladin communities collectively severed their enterprise courting on October 26, 2001.[4] wikipedia your question: because of the fact hes area of the situation purple

2016-12-15 05:11:34 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Does the rest of the world realize how close the US government and the Bin Laden family are even today?

Majority of the Bin Ladens are good people... With the power they carry in the business and financial world, It would be foolish not to be close to them!

2006-09-09 04:36:08 · answer #3 · answered by and,or,nand,nor 6 · 2 0

Its obvious that you are a lib and asked this question to harm the reputation of our president. After all, that's what you do.
Its convenient that you left out a small detail about the Bin Lauden family. They disowned Usama many years ago because he is a radical terrorist and they are not. The Bin Lauden family owns a successful construction company in Saudi Arabia and are much different than their son Usama, but I'm sure you just forgot that little detail. You wouldn't intentionally try to make people believe that the Bush family are personal friends with terrorists. I'm sure that was an honest lib mistake and not another fabricated attempt at character assassination.

2006-09-09 04:51:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

I think that you should dig a "little" deeper for your conspiracy theories.

#1 The US gov supported and supplied Bin Laden with weapons and support LOOOOOOONG before GW was even considering running for Prez.

#2 With the "lack" of information you have given, I can also conclude that the Pope was sleeping with Bin Laden also.

#3 The "family" didn't attack us. Only one of it's members. By this comparison, we can conclude that if your brother commits murder, we should consider jailing you also, maybe??

2006-09-09 06:26:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Karljt,

Yes I do.
But do you realize that he was NOT close to OSAMA bin Ladin. nor were any of the other Bin Ladin family. Osama was a "black sheep", an outcast. disowned by his own family and exiled from Saudia Arabia and his citizenship revoked.
So do you think that there is some nefarious conspiracy based on Bush knowing the OTHER Bin Ladins? the ones who were just as appalled at 9/11 as the reset of the world?

2006-09-09 04:35:51 · answer #6 · answered by CG-23 Sailor 6 · 2 1

Here is some fact for you, on September 10th, 2001 there were twelve members of the Saudi Royal Family staying at the Bush ranch in Crawford Texas. On September 11th, 2001 the twin towers were struck. All planes in American Airspace were grounded.

On September 12th, 2001 the only plane leaving this country contained all twelve of the Saudi Royal Family members.

You tell me, Bush knew twin towers was going to happen. He had an outragious amount of forewarning. He chose to do nothing in order to get us at war.

First we attack Afghanistan, oust the Taliban, run Haliburtan sponsored oil pipelines right through it. Second, we invade Iraq, destroy their economy.

Iraq was also Saudi Arabi's biggest oil competitor.

Not to mention that each and everyone of the hijackers were of Saudi Arabian ancestry.

There were no Afghani or Iraqi hijackers.

All of these facts are openly available through USA Today and United Nations reports filed by Wolf Blitzer.

From this I think that you can draw your own conclusion.

2006-09-09 04:40:39 · answer #7 · answered by ? 1 · 2 2

It has been told many many times. But it doesn't seem to register. Bush idolatry is a phenomenon that no one outside the US can understand.

Just make sure you vote for any party besides Republican on the next election.

2006-09-09 04:38:25 · answer #8 · answered by Clo 2 · 1 1

Oooooooooh.

Someone watched Farenheit 9/11 last night?

2006-09-09 04:30:55 · answer #9 · answered by Mucking Fagic! 2 · 1 1

too bad Bin Laden did not go hunting with Chenney then.

2006-09-09 06:11:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

hehe I wondered what happened to Mikey Moorer! Hi Mike!

2006-09-09 04:40:21 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers