English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

Hey Fakras, now thats a rich comment. Yet another conservative who blames Clinton for Bush's own misgivings. If the funding wasn't there, then why did Bush start a war and put our soldiers lives at risk in the first place? You people amaze me with your stupidity and ignorance.

2006-09-09 04:31:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Blame the democrats for downsizing the military, not conservatives and the hummers have all been armored and there are absolutely NO BOYS AND GIRLS IN THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ONLY MEN AND WOMEN, Do you "people" understand!!!!!!

2006-09-09 11:54:02 · answer #2 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 1 1

During the Clinton administration , the military was drastically downsized , 25% cuts in manpower , equipment , budget , the whole ball of wax ,
That's where he got his surplus , on the backs and lives of our troops !
The new body armour and armour for Hummers was on order but the order was canceled .
Aircraft , armoured vehicles , ships , all kinds of equipment were sold to scrapyards .
It takes time to rebuild after 8 yrs of neglect

2006-09-09 11:36:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

And get the anti-RPG systems installed in their tanks and STRYKERs...

WHY politics. The army has set aside certain funds to contractors and will not amend their budget to fix the problems that out boys and girls are facing today.

2006-09-09 11:45:09 · answer #4 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 1 1

I think the troops need to be donating their hummers to US to get to work in comfort

2006-09-09 11:18:01 · answer #5 · answered by OS 1 · 0 5

Probably because the funding wasn't there, because of the prior administration. It's getting better, now that funds have been re-allocated.

2006-09-09 11:15:28 · answer #6 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers