What would you rather have? A prez who gets hummers from internsOr a prez who starts wars for his own $$ gain?

Question

At least when Clinton was there the economy was booming...Now the only thing booming is Bush's bank accounts...The real question should be - Would you rather have had a prez that claims he didnt inhale( yeah right ) Or a prez who was in Betty Ford for that silver spoon up his nose - Bush was a coke head PEOPLE!!!!

For all of you BUSH lovers out there who are obviously blind - I got just 2 words for you and it is NOT ( S*ck It) DX
ITS fahrenheit 911 - WATCH IT AND LEARN SOMETHING!!!

Answer 1

hmmmmm i didn't like clinton but he did make the economy better. so what if he smoked dope. i would too if i had a hard job like that. Bush is hopeless. i didn't vote for him either time. i am scared though of who our next president might be. i'm hoping dick lugar runs.

Answer 2

As a fellow liberal, I must warn you against Farenheit 9/11 and "documentaries" with shoddy sources, however if you spend a few minutes surfing the web, you can easily find reputable sources talking about what really happened on 9/11.

Honestly, I don't think Clinton was that great, he was pretty much a Republican posing as a Democrat, but at least we didn't have war and were still able to carry water-bottles and cosmetics on airplanes. If I had a choice, I'd rather have Clinton as President. But if I could choose someone different, I'd say FDR. Our country NEEDS a new FDR before we sink into total economic depression.

Answer 3

You have no idea what your saying, Take a look at all the charges against Bill and Hillary Clinton for fraud and other illegal activities.
You think they weren't lining their pockets? Damn they were
renting out rooms in the whitehouse for christsake.

As far as the economy goes, the housing industry has seen the largest boom in history in the past 6 years.
Companys are making record profits. And where do those profits go, IN YOUR 401K.......

Answer 4

Please take a history class. Clinton was not brought up on charges of sexual harassment in that instance (though he was sued three other times for it).

Take an economics class, Clinton had nothing to do with the stack market boom. Allan Greenspan and fed reserve policy did.

Clinton's spoon was just as silver as Bush's.

Coke head or sexual predator...wow great choices LOL

Answer 5

Depends on what presidents you are talking about. If you are talking about _low Job Bill and GW, some of your description of them is lies. As far as I know, neither of them starts wars for monetary gain. If you have proof, show me. If _low Job Bill had not lied under oath about his hummers, he would be more acceptable; even so, GW is the one I want under any circumstances.

Answer 6

Yes most people who have stocks and investments are making money now, that is called a good economy.

And of course the war has nothing to do with anyone making money except those that have stock in companies that make war supplies. And I don't beleve he does, And in fact he does not know what he has or not has, since he has to put all of his investments in trust and has no control over his investments.

This is a commom misconception over the money of Presidents

And I am sorry you don't like our current president and have decided to spread lies since you don't have any truths to discredit him with

Answer 7

Neither, I'd rather have a president that gives hummers for his own $$ gain.

Answer 8

I love your ranting. I imagine that you have access to these bank accounts? Have you heard of blind trusts for elected officials? I'm guessing not. Come back to Earth when ready.

Answer 9

The hummers are good for me. We've lost almost as many as were lost in the world trade center thanks to Bush & his cronies.

Answer 10

Good old Bill, we know why he had a smile on his face, and was so chilled out. :)