If the Democrats gain the majority of the House in November, they can actually impeach Bush.
Now the problem is after he is impeached because following impeachment, he will get a hearing in the Senate which more than likely is going to remain majority Republican.
2006-09-16 18:15:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by BeachBum 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The story we have been told is that Clinton lied under oath, in fact he did not. He lied but not under oath. That may be unscrupulous but not, in fact, illegal. To tell the American people that WMD's were present in Iraq, stage a war based on this lie, sacrifice thousands of Americans in the pursuit of protecting that lie, make life miserable for Iraqis in the most populous and largest of the provinces, to allow Al Qaeda into Iraq (from which they were previously TOTALLY unwelcome) and to divert essential resources from Afghanistan where we had Al Qaeda on the ropes....all of these things suggest that this crazy branch of the Republican party needs to be purged. They are either total liars or totally incompetent. They need to go. By the way, Rumsfeld needs to be indicted!
2006-09-12 08:17:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by cirdellin 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, the first thing you need is to get rid of the republican control of Congress.
The second thing you need is to impeach and convict President Cheney first, and get rid of him, then turn to Mr. Bush and get rid of him. If you impeach and convict Mr. Bush first, that would leave President Cheney still in charge. (By the way, impeach merely means to bring him to trial. He must be convicted in the trial before he can be removed from office.) If you impeach and convict President Cheney first and remove him from office, you could then get a vice-president installed to take Bush's place, when he is impeached, convicted and removed.
The third thing you'd need is to have a solid case. Bush has made lying into an art form. Everything he says is a lie, so you'd need to find some really good ones. But in addition to the lies, you'd need some "high crimes" of which there are many, but the Congress is also guilty, so the likelihood of Congress voting to impeach itself is zero.
OK, now the likelihood of the republicans losing control of Congress is extremely small, particularly since they control the voting booths and voting machines and can rig the vote in November just as they have done before. Even if they were to lose control, there probably would not be enough democrats (60) to win a vote for impeachment and conviction. And even if there were enough democrats in the Senate (60), the presiding judge in the impeachment trial is the Chief Justice, a Bush appointee.
The likelihood of President Cheney being impeached, convicted, and removed, and a new vice-president installed before Bush was impeached, convicted, and removed is extremely small. So all you'd get for impeaching Bush is Cheney, like being attacked by a rottweiler instead of a doberman.
2006-09-09 02:00:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by Pandak 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
When we convince the senate and supreme court.
George W. Bush is a moran. He should be impeached and executed for high treason of the United States of America.
Hes too stupid to think, he paid his way through elementry, middle, high school. and college, if not he would be stuck in the first grade!
He was never elected either time. He LOST the popular vote TWICE!
2006-09-09 11:40:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jeremy© ® ™ 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Impeachment will go forward after Democrats take back the Congress. That's why this election is the most important in our History. According to new polls out Democrats are leading in every race. The Congress will launch the largest investigation in History, Bigger than Nixon and Clinton added. This is fact.
BTW, the lies Bush has told the American people are well known to the American people, no one who is well informed would not know this. BTW, when faced with total failure Republicans love blame Clinton for Bush's failures. Because of the Republicans hatred of Clinton's both are very wealthy now. BTWW, every time Bush speaks he lies, all the Democrats need is for Bush to keep speaking.
2006-09-09 01:48:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by jl_jack09 6
·
5⤊
4⤋
President Bush has not committed any impeachable offenses. After the ABC "docudrama" Clinton might be in trouble again!
2006-09-09 02:07:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Bawney 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
Clinton lied to a grand jury, to Congress, and most importantly the American people. If Clinton had addressed the problem of Bin Laden after the bombing of the USS Cole, 9/11 wouldn't have even happened. Bush has stopped terrorism on American soil and has had to clean up after 8 yrs of democrat ineffectiveness. I guess you would like to impeach someone that makes your own party look that bad.
Try in 2009, you might be able to impeach him then.
2006-09-09 01:50:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by dlobryan1 4
·
4⤊
5⤋
Bla, Bla, Bla. Don't you libs ever get tired of the same old crap? If Clinton had taken out OBL 12 years ago you wouldn't be having this conversation. Everyone is to blame and no one is to blame so get over it!!
2006-09-09 02:18:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by The Mick "7" 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
Lying is the correct word. We can impeach him, when we can
execute, those that are aiding the enemy. Let me count those
out for you, as you were not paying attention.
2006-09-09 01:55:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
I am one of those "dangerous" liberals. However, I don't believe in violence of any kind, so you can ponder it if you don't want to read my answer.
Dubb-ya obviously fouled us up and there is no way he can redeem himself. He doesn't care anymore and isn't even trying. I hope these "peaceloving" conservatives learned a lesson from the last two elections. Just let him slide into history as the worst president ever. We only have two more years. The important thing is not to fall into the corporate/government propaganda until it's over.
2006-09-09 02:00:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by mindrizzle 3
·
2⤊
4⤋