Everyone has their own personal preference, but I think model rocketry is a fun one.
2006-09-09 01:49:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by not_prfikt 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
A hobby is a fairly small, very swift falcon with long, narrow wings. There are four birds called hobby, and three others which, although termed falcon, are very similar. All specialise in catching prey on the wing.
* The Eurasian Hobby (Falco subbuteo), also known as the Northern Hobby.
* The African Hobby (Falco cuvierii).
* The Oriental Hobby (Falco severus).
* The Australian Hobby or Little Falcon (Falco longipennis) is uncommon but widespread in Australia. During the southern winter, some birds migrate to the north of the continent or to the islands of South-east Asia.
* The Karearea or New Zealand Falcon (Falco novaeseelandiae).
* The Sooty Falcon (Falco concolor) of the North African desert.
* Eleonora's Falcon (Falco eleonorae) occupies the Mediterranean area during the northern summer, and migrates south to Madagascar for the southern summer.
Hobbies are superb aerialists. Although they will take prey on the ground if the opportunity presents itself, most prey is caught in the wing: insects by hawking, birds are flown down: even swifts and swallows cannot outpace or outmanoeuver a hobby.
2006-09-09 02:10:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
this is a sturdy question. i've got responded many notably much comparable inquiries to this one in the previous, so i will purely provide a quick recap right here. Ghost searching (GH) is below no circumstances a real "technology". There are some scientists who work together in this activity, besides the fact that this is (as you propose) one in each of those activity - an none of those declare that ghost searching is rather a technology. technology demands using the scientific approach, which demands that any documents accrued be reproducible. it is one section the place GH fails the try--one can't reproduce "ghost documents". added, there are actually not any scientific thoeries that make testable predictions wrt ghosts. era. GH is what we confer with as a "pseudo-technology" -- it is, some thing that may no longer technology, yet is provided as though it have been. regrettably, there is no regulation to forbid this, so it as much as you to be attentive to the version. one undertaking to look for with pseudo-technology is that if it is getting used to fire up public interest that could carry approximately earnings for the presenters; or if it is being provided as enteratinment--like "faucets". fairly, be careful with this. you could legally call something "technology", regardless of how un-scientific, or completely lame this is. make certain which you do have sturdy definitions of: technology, thought, hypothesis, and the scientific approach. understanding those properly will help you to no longer be fooled.
2016-10-14 12:13:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
For me, it's astronomy because the stars are so far away and it's interesting to not be able to know about every little thing that is up in the sky.
2006-09-09 02:12:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Trying new experiments,especially with explosive chemicals. Check out the cells of micro-organisms in a Microscope.Mix chemicals and form mixtures. Burning Magnesium and basically experimenting everything..I LOVE SCIENCE!!
2006-09-09 01:19:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Astronomy is really interesting - I study it at Uni but not as my major course and it is really intruiging - i find myself just sitting reading the book for pleasure instead of as homework!!
2006-09-09 01:28:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Showaddywaddy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Proving Newton's law of gravity wrong.
"When my pecker says, " against the Law of Gravity I keep rising"
2006-09-09 01:15:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by cooldude 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
experimenting with my biology teacher, , and calculating energy, velocity, potential and kinetic, , science freak, ,
2006-09-09 01:15:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by saccharine baby 1
·
0⤊
0⤋