They can't defend their actions so they attack Clinton to distract their butt-clenched Christian base who will always hate anyone who finds sex enjoyable. Two Presidents, The first president initiates a bloody, costly, unending war on false premises and approves covert policies of illegal detentions, kangaroo courts, extraordinary renditions, torture and warretless wire-tappings of thousands of Americans. The second president lies about hooking up with an intern. QUESTION - Which one should be impeached? Which one should be supported? Which one should be trashed and thrown away?
2006-09-09 06:08:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by iknowtruthismine 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Basically it's cause Clinton being in office was a joke (obviously). What republicans are trying to say is at least we have a president who's trying to accomplish something. As GW said "I will not forget". Remember 9/11? And it wasn't so much Clinton getting a hummer but for lying under OATH! C'mon. He's the biggest joke this country's ever had. Imagine if Kerry were president. All that came out of his mouth were lies. This country probably wouldn't be here anymore. Thank God the San Francisco liberal hippies aren't spread too wide. Most of the nation has enough sense.
2006-09-11 19:28:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They don't want US citizens to look at what a horrible job they are doing so they try to change the focus to someone from the other side. It has been effective thus far, to my dismay.
Bush cannot or will not answer the tough questions. Did you see the debates with Kerry? Every time a tough question was asked, Bush got that deer in the headlights look on his face, then he'd change the subject to "No Child Left Behind" or Social Security reform. How is that going by the way? Has education been improved by the No Child Left Behind act? If it were a resounding success, why has Bush failed to mention that in any of his speeches? Has Social Security been reformed, other than making seniors pay more for prescription drugs? Or doesn't he want that much to change because he will be due to recieve his own check soon. Social Security would be fine if it wouldn't be robbed to pay outstanding debts.
In a nutshell, the current administration cannot admit to the crimes they have committed.
2006-09-08 18:45:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Schona 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Actually I think the point that is being raised is "Remove the the plank from thine eye before removing the splinter from your brothers." The Democrats who ask most of these questions can't really be taken serious when they did the same thing. And Bush hasn't broke the law, unlike Bill Clinton, who committed perjury when he lied under oath. The Democrats are guilty of the very sins which they now try to pin on George W. Bush. Its like if a if someone shot a guy, and then came out and said somebody else should be arrested for assaulting a guy. You have to have the highground before criticizing.
2006-09-08 18:38:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by rumraba 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
He dropped out, even as amusing, his indiscretions did not amuse his spouse. He in no way replaced right into a severe candidate, he replaced into comic alleviation. i'll't say the Democrats have an outstanding record with women persons, yet they practice more desirable progression than the Republicans have shown, Republicans are about 20 years behind Democrats contained in the type of ladies persons mountaineering the ladders to be considered for top positions. Their remedy of Hillary and Ferraro were a lot less inspired.
2016-11-25 21:40:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
When Clinton was in office, he was like:
“I've never broken any drug law”
"But its important that we not panic; there is no immediate danger to retirement"
“The only people who will pay more income taxes are the wealthiest 2 percent”
"Everyone knows that I have tougher ethic rules than any other President"
“Oral sex is not sex”
“John Kennedy had actually not been back to the White House since his father was killed, until I had became president”
“I can spend your money better than you can”
'My grandmother was one-quarter Cherokee”
"It depends on how you define "alone" ... there were a lot of times when we were alone, but I never really thought we were."
"It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is"
“The Bush administration continues to coddle China”
“When I was in England, I experimented with marijuana a time or two, and I didn't like it.
I didn't inhale and never tried it again."
“I did not have sexual relations with that woman”
And now he’s like, “ I just want people to tell the truth” (about ABC’s docudrama)
ROTFL
2006-09-08 22:26:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by rochambeau 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
MANBEARPIG (Yea, I saw South Park): The problem is we are at war and our Valued Soldiers are dying in a Civil War that cannot be solved by us. Clinton did not place this country at war in Iraq over a lie. Clinton is not trying to be a dictator. I don't remember Clinton placing secret camps, illegally tapping our phones, and trying to use the Constitution as toilet paper.
Clinton did wrong. He had to take responsibility. He stated he lied about the affair. Why can't bush take responsibility and say he lied about this war?
2006-09-08 18:38:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by linus_van_pelt68 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Because they have no real defense for their actions. They also forget that Clinton had to lead this country with a Republican control and did manage to get some social things done. He couldn't get much done about terrorism because of them. The Lewinski thing only came out because they were unable to stop him from going forth with plans to get bin Laden and Hussein. I'm sure that Bill wasn't the ONLY one who was having daliances.
2006-09-08 18:39:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
One reason could be that they don't find arguments. Another reason could be It's a compulsion.
Dubya and Clinton are not perfects.
2006-09-09 05:52:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mysterio 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
the reason lying bill is back is because of ABC's movie that tells the Truth about what a sorry piece of sh*t clinton is, and how he ignored the terrorist. We a truly reaping what he sowed!!!!
2006-09-09 00:39:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋