personally, i consider him to be a republican who called himself a democrat, and took his orders directly from george bush sr.
2006-09-08 18:13:59 · 16 answers · asked by list 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
"just because something doesn't make sense to YOU, doesn't mean it doesn't make sense"
- ancient babylonian proverb
2006-09-08 18:16:17 · update #1
don't get the wrong idea- i don't want to be called a liberal...
2006-09-08 18:18:40 · update #2
Took orders from Bush Sr?
Was this before or after realizing your son came from the future & discovering that President Washington was a cyborg?
2006-09-09 00:16:07 · answer #1 · answered by amg503 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Permission to be a "liberal" is granted by the National Liberal Dudes Committee on a case-by-case basis.
They now are working to clear up a huge backlog of applications -- it seems even the most loyal Conservatives can no longer stomach the administration's bulls**t.
If you apply now, you'll probable be allowed to call yourself a liberal by the November elections.
Good luck!
2006-09-08 18:21:15 · answer #2 · answered by Jay 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Clinton didn't role model the ideal family man, but his presidency was brilliant, and our country flourished under his administration.
Bush has started a war, killed countless thousands of innocent people, and run our national debt to the point where our grandchildren's futures are already mortgaged.
Bush hides behind a veil of false Christianity while he violates our Constitution at every step.
I used to be a Republican, but Bush changed my mind!
2006-09-08 18:26:14 · answer #3 · answered by RG 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, you are right George Bush is evil, but wrong with Bill Clinton who just was sleazy.
2006-09-08 18:36:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i assume Iraq may well be the terrific internet site for Bush celebrations. in spite of everything, in 1999 Yugoslavia filed a criticism against NATO (U.S. secure) for conflict crimes. Now 10 years later Clinton is their hero. Now human beings think of that Bush committed conflict crimes in Iraq, so I gues following an identical development, quickly he would be celebrated there.
2016-10-14 12:03:02 · answer #5 · answered by sachiko 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you in a way... the only problem is... Bush is a incompetent fool that calls himself a Republican... at least Clinton was a Republican and watched the purse strings...
2006-09-08 18:24:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't think it makes you any less of a "liberal" to not like any president or candidate. In fact, it just proves that you actually THINK, instead of following a party blindly. That's one thing that really irks me. Voting for one candidate over another just because he's a Republican or Democrat is just plain ridiculous.
2006-09-08 18:22:55 · answer #7 · answered by tateronmycouch 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
If you like or dislike Clinton is irrelevant! Are you a liberal thinker? If you are, you are a liberal and it doesn't matter what other people think. You can call yourself what ever you like!
2006-09-08 18:17:43 · answer #8 · answered by tjinjapan 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no no no, clinton ordered himself around... and just because you didnt like clinton doesnt change your stand on the issues... i know alot of republicans that dont care for bush
2006-09-08 18:17:03 · answer #9 · answered by shut up dummy 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Are you saying Bush is evil. The only way to determine if Clinton was more evil is to count the body bags. I think we all know that Bush wins in that catagory.
2006-09-08 18:19:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋