The Democrats are up to their old tricks again!!!!!!!!?

Question

For those of you who are unaware, ABC is broadcasting a movie called "The Path to 9/11" ...It shows how Bill Clinton and the DEMOCRATIC Administration were actually to blame for the 9/11 attacks on America. By blame, I mean that they knew about the immanent danger and did nothing about it...and then...tryed to blame George Bush for it, when in all actuality it was their (Dem's) fault...Anyway...The DEMOCRATS forced ABC to pull hte movie because it showed them for the cowards and hypocrates they are...How do you feel about this? I thought the DEMOCRATS were all about freedom of speech??????
Spell check didnt work!!!!

Answer 1

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
- Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens Carl Levin (D-MI), Tom Daschle (D-SD), John Kerry ( D - MA), and others Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
- Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002


"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons...."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years . We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do."
- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapon stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation .. And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

SO NOW THESE SAME DEMOCRATS SAY PRESIDENT BUSH LIED, THAT THERE NEVER WERE ANY WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, AND THAT HE TOOK US TO WAR UNECESSARILY?

Answer 2

I disagree. It seems to me all the hubbub is because it is a docudrama that took too much dramatic license in presenting the story. From what I understand, there were outright falsehoods and fabrications in it. The right is even lambasting this pile of trash.
Oh, by the way, it was Al Qaeda's fault. Why do you feel the need to blame either Clinton OR Bush for it?
Your diatribe is a perfect example of why it needed to be pulled. There are many people who will take it as gospel, then the rounds of hysterics and not being able to come to valid conclusions starts all over again.
Instead of looking for any reason to try and justify your skewed viewpoint, try investigating the allegations to see what the real story is.

Answer 3

It matters little to me what the polls are saying today, I can't see Americans voting in the likes of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. The Democrats have set themselves up so that the only way they look good is if America suffers... if more soldiers die...if more Iraqi's are slaughtered. In that light, watching the news everynight must be like scratching a lottery ticket with a shiny penny, there's always a chance America will be devastated, or at the very least, a few Americans killed so Democrats can cry " See! We told you that we should have surrendered long ago! Now look at what Bush has done! He's killed more of our soldiers!"

Answer 4

Please start thinking for yourself.
You have selective blindness, you need to open your eyes to all the arguments before you form an opinion.
The Democrats had everyone arrested in all the acts of terrorism against the USA, except Bin Laden. Who escaped by the skin of his teeth - the only one with US Forces involvement. By doing this they increased their allies around the world, and killed almost no civilians.
The Republicans turned the world into a pile of sh*t when they dropped the ball. Making the world an incredibly more dangerous place. They invaded 2 countries, one for greed. And supported the indiscriminate bombing of civilians by themselves and others. They tortured or killed almost everyone they found in any combat zone they created. They started a television channel to broadcast their propaganda to the American people, and had fired all those journalists who took a stand against them. This documentary was made under that Republican regime and deliberately gave Republican lies, and now your complaining that the Democrats are upset about it.

Answer 5

Obama Told Pelosi and Reid to bring a 700 billion dollar plan to the floor for a vote. How can anyone taint his character worse than that?

Answer 6

The irony here is that they didn't try to silence Michael Mooron with his trashy movie. They didn't silence him but they try to silence this show? ANYONE who makes a movie based on 9/11 has to get their facts straight, I agree with that. But if you want to show me someone who flat out LIED about what went on with 9/11, then talk about Michael Moore. At least this 9/11 movie shows us how Clinton himself also failed while getting it on with monica.

Answer 7

Isn't it time for Americans to stop placing blame on other Americans?

Answer 8

even though i agree with you they ahve been playing this game with the media too long to do anything about it. We just have to worry about our safety instead of pointing fingers... even if that means liberals+conservatives working together.

Answer 9

Ooh, feel better now? Your mommy cuddle you to back to sweep again?

Answer 10

Are Republicans up to their usual crap? Looks like it.

Answer 11

Shut UP