I still don't understand the Pentagon crash?

Question

I have no theory to offer and am not seeking conspiracy theory, nor ridicule that doesn't actually answer anything.

I'm sure alot of people on a given plane died, somewhere. What I don't understand, which has already been cited countless times but still not really adressed, are these points:

A plane of the size of Flight 77 should have been higher in the security cam frames, unless it was digging up a trench in the Pentagon lawn. Even accounting for delay between frames, SOME image of the plane should have been present -- even if blurred, it should have been larger, it's simply a matter of relative scale. The records say it did hit the ground. Where is the upturned dirt?

The records say debris broke through the inner ring of the Pentagon, with a photo showing the "exit wound." Other photos from above show damage to the outer ring and innermost ring, but none in the open areas between the other rings. How is that physically possible?

Also, if you've seen footage of high velocity impacts of airborne vehnicles into concrete, nothing "disintegrates completely. Compare with the WTC -- if it can go in, it will go in, if it can't, it will rain debris OUTSIDE the structure. There is no debris field in Pentagon photos.

I'm sure by now you've read all the other bizarre details of this scene, so I won't parrot them here.

Again, I'm not saying who did or didn't or didn't do anything, I don't know.

All I care about are reasonable answers grounded in sound physics to these implausible details, inclusive of details that support the mainstream story. I'm not cheering for the accepted story or conspiracy theory either way.

Okay, I'm begging here. If you offer a one-liner like "they blew it up early" can you please give details, because we've only been told about razor blades, not bombs.

I've seen the pic with the ingle piece of debris, but where's the debris ~field~ or trench?

I'm ~begging~ for answers to the question as posed, not a question that wasn't asked, such as "what was the intended target.

Everything I've ever seen about the sheared lamposts indicated they were 90 degrees away from the official trajectory of the aircaft. I'd love to see that program though, what channel was it on?

Answer 1

Saw this question yesterday. Aircraft are made of light and combustible materials, tanks were full of fuel. If you look closely you will notice an engine lying just outside the entry point. A lot of folks died in that crash, their families would have blown the lid off of this one. A friend I worked with had a son that is an Airborne Ranger, MOS - medic, 1st responder. It happened, terrible as it was. Set up triage tent with in minutes and started culling the survivors.

Answer 2

The pentagon was the target. Think about this, the pentagon is where the majority of the militay decisions are made. I have family memebers that work for the government. Although their opinions; professional or civilian, are pretty much the same. It was the intended target. I think you should worry less about the pentagon as a target, and seriously think about the inteded target for flight 93. We will never know the intended target from that flight, thanks to the heroism of the passengers. How do we know that there weren't more flights? After all the mayhem, all flights were grounded. Remember? There could have been more targets. Those may have been the only targets. These are things that we can not explain. I do feel however, that in about 20 years, all of our questions will soon be answered as the information continues to unfold from that dreadful day.

Answer 3

One thing that is certain
you can never completely predict. or explain what happens to a mass that contacts another mass at over five hundred miles an hour..
All the experts in the world can say what they want, but they will privately concede that every new crash investigation teaches them to not predetermine what they are going to learn about the next one.
Our government is way too open for any internal fraud to happen with out somebody in the loop getting greedy and leaking info.
Accept the fact that .
1 a plane full of people and fuel disappeared, and a super reinforced structure suffered a sever blow to it.
2 There was plane debris in the surrounding area, as well as in the building
3 two other planes full of fuel, and people were flown into structures that have political significance, as well as the one that was driven into the ground at the same approximate time.
And besides

Answer 4

I just saw a program last night about a California investigator who does computer simulations and reconstructs things like this. He has painstakingly reconstructed the entire crash by pc using the security camera video and the lampposts that were sheared by the planes wings. He has photos of a lot of debris and large pieces of the plane.
The plane sheared lamp posts in coming into the building, but it did not touch the ground until it hit the building.It came in low and remained low. It appeared smaller on the security cams because they have a different angle lens.
I wish i could remember his name, but I can't . It was a very interesting piece.

Answer 5

You are overlooking some rather important specifics here.. 1. the observers of the crash made statements on tv (immediately following the crash) of the plane being about 10 feet off the ground.. 2. Planes are made of aluminum, if you want a scientific explanation, find out what the melting point of that metal is. Also, how long would it take to melt down?

Answer 6

As unfortunate as it may seem, this will be one of the many burning questions that is destined to remain unanswered for decades to come. The powers that be (government) have the answer to your question but will not disclose this information to the public for fear the American people will loose faith in the system. There are many examples of this in history. Twenty years from now some bright and eager reporter will do an investigative story which will be aired to the public, opening this can of worms. Maybe the question will be answer, but I am afraid that more questions will arise.

Answer 7

A plane hit a building lots of lives were lost lots of damage was done. Stop thinking so hard you might hurt yourself.

A better question is how could it have not happen the way it is said to have happen. Too many people died too much news coverage for it to have not happen the way it is said to have.

Answer 8

The plane flew into the building with such force it desegregated.

Answer 9

The really annoying part of this put up job was that it ruined the 'Moon Landing' set!!

Answer 10

Well it is simple the terrorists blew up the plane a bit early.