English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

25 answers

You.
i'm sorry you're so bitter, misguided, gullible.

2006-09-08 14:27:46 · answer #1 · answered by Bad Kitty! 7 · 6 2

Bush is the real liar out of the whole gang.

Anne Coulter and Bill O'Reilly actually believe what they say, which makes them not "liars" but more along the lines of "retards".

And Rush Limbaugh, well...hes just insane.

2006-09-08 14:32:53 · answer #2 · answered by Jesus W. 6 · 2 3

Who LIES more often:

A.)Rush Limbaugh
B.)Ann Coulter
C.)Bill Reilly
D.)George W. Bush
E.) Your typical extreme left wing liberal democrat

Hmmmm I would have too say the correct answer is: E!

next time you ask a question please remember to ask it correctly....you for got too list E.) ......the way you asked it, the question had no correct answer..... ofcourse that is typical a typical democrat for you ask a question that will only give the democrat the answer they want too hear.....never mind about the truth......then again the typical democrat can't or won't handle the Truth!

2006-09-08 14:41:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

expensive Leroy, i do not care at fascinated about punditry typically, even if its political inclination. I hate Ann Coulter as a lot as Al Franken. Pundits contribute surely no longer something to humanity. they do no longer attempt to locate the reality yet merely to spin modern activities into controversies for his or her personal income. Their interpretations are deliberately hardline and provocative because pandering to human beings's lowest instincts will pay handsomely, as demagogues the international over have continually basic. The technique of pundits is so easy and invariable that it really is a ask your self that such an excellent number of nonetheless have not seen with the help of them. Pundits continually portray themselves as lonely, persecuted prophets supposedly oppressed through variously sinister Powers That Be (the "liberal media", "the conservative device", "the Godless institution", etc). that's an fairly previous trick. in reality, what they spout is hopelessly conformist, biased and emotional nonsense in which there is under no circumstances any room for nuance, stability or honest diagnosis. What bothers me the most is that maximum pundits declare to talk for an elusive decrease-center classification ("the strong, good individuals obtainable") which they could no longer probable be more beneficial removed from. the three characters you've merely pronounced are multi-millionnaires who in reality ought to no longer care a lot less for the tens of millions of unfavourable human beings they declare to look after. they're international-classification hypocrites. Pundits do an spectacular disservice to democracy. through deliberately framing debates round severe ideological strains, they polarise society and marginalise the overall public of life like, life like those who position self assurance in tolerance and worry-free sense. through crying wolf so violently on the slightest party, they dilute the authentic themes at stake interior the country and discredit the various honest those who've surely got here across authentic wolves yet won't be able to be heard. Pundits recklessly abuse the first modification to spew provocative nonsense. They gladly take each and every of the privileges linked to freedom of speech yet refuse to shoulder any of its established jobs. i look ahead to an afternoon even as the poisonous impact of those parasites of democracy should be proper extinguished. desire this helped,

2016-10-15 23:39:35 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I've got a better idea. Take something that say Bill O'Reilly said that you think is a lie, not misinformation, but a lie, and bring it to discuss. So, go ahead, you brought it up, tell us one of these lies that has you so offended... ? We're waiting....

2006-09-08 14:36:35 · answer #5 · answered by blakest.anthony 2 · 3 1

CIte specifics. Start with Rush. Give me dates and times and what exactly he lied about. Flapping your trap. No facts. Get a life

Rush is the number 1 talk radio personality. Ann sells millions of books O'Reilly is the number 1 cable news show GWB is one of very few Presidents to ever win reelection. All these are more successful on their own than 100 of you.

2006-09-08 14:28:13 · answer #6 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 5 4

You're lazy. Get a note pad and keep count of the lies all by yourself. You don't really think anybody else is going to keep count, do you?

2006-09-08 14:35:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

George W. Bush
i suggest that they add him to the genius records for achieving this number of lies in the american history

congrats Mr. Bush

2006-09-08 14:31:23 · answer #8 · answered by ? ? 3 · 2 3

that's like asking ~

"which hurts more: cutting off your arm with a rusty saw, swallowing glass shards, open heart surgery w/o anasthetic, or being eaten alive by sharks?"

none of the alternatives are terribly attractive.

(yes that last bit was a pun. not a good one, but...)

2006-09-08 14:30:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

All of them combined didnt lie as much as Bill Clinton.

2006-09-08 14:30:29 · answer #10 · answered by Kevin P 3 · 3 2

good job douche. You only picked right wingers.

How bout, Michael Moore, Al Frankin, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Al Gore.

See I can do it too.

2006-09-08 14:28:22 · answer #11 · answered by Jon H 5 · 4 2

fedest.com, questions and answers