No much is ever said about the anthrax attack at the democratic offices of the U.S. Senate. Did this have anything to do with the authorization to go to war by the democrats. With these senators whisked away from their offices while listening to Bush describe the chemical and biological weapons from Iraq and seeing the anthrax envelopes postmarked from Iraq, did this have anything to do with influencing their votes? Were they scared? Who perpetuated this attack? I certainly wouldn't suggest it was those terrorist republican's, but who was it? They were never caught right? What kind of equipment and expertise is required to produce anthrax? It's not as easy as making meth is it? Why don't the democrats prove they can effectively fight terror by finding these perpetrators?
2006-09-08
14:22:42
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
Herdoula, why did they send it to the democratic leadership?
2006-09-08
14:53:45 ·
update #1
Zelda, I know it's biological and very difficult to work with. Beyond the reach of the average terrorist. Who could have done it, and why?
2006-09-08
14:55:45 ·
update #2
Tom Collins, why won't DHS do their job? If they won't do it shouldn't someone? The senate does conduct hearings and investigations do they not?
2006-09-08
14:57:39 ·
update #3
Here's an article linking Iraq to Anthrax
http://www.commondreams.org/views01/1022-08.htm
2006-09-08
15:10:40 ·
update #4