Currently this summer, Iraq's have died at a rate of 1000 per month. This was more than under sadam. Sadam had to act like an *** because his people are heathens. It wasnt him ordering killings, it was his corrupt soldiers and his son. Cant blame parents for their kids actions. Of course I dont know how much of that is true. The united states admitted paying reporters for propaganda in miami. How much propaganda money did they spend on WMD's? Now why are we in IraQ? There are hundreds of governments killing their own people, why not invade them too? Is it the oil? or is it that the united states are owned by investors of other countries? Whats your thougth on BUSH who released the benladen family while all flights were grounded and who didnt get interviewed by the CIA?
2006-09-08 12:53:16 · 19 answers · asked by circusdejojo 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Saddam is dangerous and a bad man at least for America. I don't support going into Iraq JUST to take him out as you can see the price for doing that is too high. But since we are already paying the price and have already gone in, No. Saddam is an evil person and putting him behind bars is a good thing. It just wasn't worth the cost.
2006-09-08 13:10:54 · answer #1 · answered by choyryu 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To answer your initial question, Hell No! Sadam should not be released. He is a murderer and killed thousands of people for his own personal gain and pleasure. Sadam is not an innocent. He deserves a quick trial and death sentence, if he would stop his little circus in court they could get on with it. We are in Iraq to stifle the insurgents (ie. Terrorists). This is not an overnight expedition. Must I keep reminding people of 9/11? Think about it.
2006-09-08 20:05:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, Saddam should be released. I say this because even if he used heavy-handed tactics to keep the people in line, maybe that was called for in that particular part of the world. He seemed to do a much better job of it than our meddling government has been able to do. I'm still waiting for someone to give me one good reason why our soldiers are over there fighting and dying. We are not the world's peacekeepers! Besides, we have enough problems right here at home to keep our government occupied for many years. I don't buy into the excuse Bush keeps using that we are over there for our own protection. I think Kim Jong Il and that Iranian madman are bigger threats to us. Why have we not attacked them? Oh, and don't forget China!
2006-09-08 20:08:40 · answer #3 · answered by worldwise1 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, I do. Release him from prison and turn him over to the CIA for Air Transport to an "undisclosed location."
On the way to that location by CIA Arilines, have them open the door and release him from the airplane. He will be free to go anywhere he wishes. He should be given a Complaint Form that he can file on the way down if he does not desire to follow the government's release program.
2006-09-08 20:07:35 · answer #4 · answered by zahbudar 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, Saddam should hang. Saddam broke the cease fire accord from the 1st desert storm, we had every right to kick his *** out of power. It is also a strategic (look that word up) front in the battle against terrorism(not terrorists) terrorism. Look past the end of your nose.
2006-09-08 20:05:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Release a guy who used chemical weapons on his own people? Rea lease a guy who filled mass graves with thousands upon thousands upon thousands of people? Release a guy who had rape rooms, children's prisons, show trials? Release a guy who paid 25 thousand dollars to the familes of suicide bombers who killed Israeli people? Release a guy who built palaces from pilfered oil for food money while his people starved and could not get medical care? Wow. Just how misguided are you when it comes to history?
2006-09-08 20:03:53 · answer #6 · answered by JB 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam won't take back the power even if Bush go down on his knees and beg, that would end Bush problems and Hussein won't make it easy for Bush
2006-09-08 21:18:42 · answer #7 · answered by class4 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes they should let him free cuz then i can kick his @ss from here to Iraq for killing Innocent people that bastard ,oh and why are u saying that the orderrings of those innocent deaths isn't Saddam's fault that it was his sons and soldiers fault huh?If he was so damn innocent then why didn't he stop those killings then huh? i think we should leave Iraq and nuke Iran and north Korea they are the real danger we bombed the hell out of Hiroshima,japan and know look at them they are our friends they love us.
2006-09-08 20:09:24 · answer #8 · answered by ... 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's all a big conspiracy theory told us by politicians to show they look good. Let's grab a couple of sticks of double mint gum and throw them at them for causing us this grief.
I want to know, have you ever seen the rain?
I want to know, have you ever seen the rain
Comin' down on a sunny day?
2006-09-08 19:55:41 · answer #9 · answered by Egroeg_Rorepme 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We did invade other countrys , Clinton invaded Bosnia....
Reagan invaded Panama and Granada
2006-09-08 19:59:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋