This is in an area that couldn't possibly be more gray. In the US, if you're doing something out in public (i.e. not on your own private property) you have no legal expectation of privacy. Therefore anyone that photographs or video tapes you has no legal obligation to obtain your permission. So from that perspective, no you wouldn't need to get any form of permission regardless of how the picture was used. However, it is often a good idea to try and get explicit permission either before or after the shot. The thing is, at least here in the states, even though the law says one thing, the courts often rule in seemingly contradictory ways. Generally those types of lawsuits happen because the subject is surprised and therefore angered if their picture shows up somewhere else. If they know they had the picture taken, it isn't as much of a surprise and they're less likely to become upset especially to the point of suing.
2006-09-08 12:57:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
opposite to what each body seems to trust, contained in the united kingdom there is genuinely NO criminal requirement to get permission to take anyones image even if on inner most or public sources. If someone is on inner most sources they're completely entitled to take pictures except they have been specially informed with the help of the owner/administration no longer to. also there is genuinely NO criminal requirement for the photographer to get permission to apply the image both in editorial or commercial context. i'll qualify the above with the "sensible proper to privateness" bit, i.e. even if that's largely you and they on your mattress room then you definately might want to have a case, even if that's contained in the back backyard at a fish fry or the like with a multitude of others round then no risk. IF e-e book of the picture is libelous or defamatory then you definately can take out a civil adventure to have it bumped off. IF e-e book of the picture (or the captioning) might want to be shown to be negative for your recognition then you definately can sue for elimination and attainable damages. operating example, if it replaced right into a shot of you taking a drink and the caption replaced into alongside the traces of "Fred the alcoholic getting completely inebriated at blah blah". Or if it replaced into used to promote a product that you've been properly time-honored to oppose. be conscious that it is not likely to be the case except you're a "call". in case you want to convey a case hostile to the photographer for something then be prepared to might want to spend a lot of money and more desirable than in all probability lose.
2016-11-25 21:17:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you are out in public, then anyone can take pictures of you. However, if they are peeking through the windows of your house you may be able to fight that. They are tresspassing at this point. Also, if they publish the pictures, your consent has to be in writing. Contact the police department or the magistrates office to find out what you may be able to do.
2006-09-08 13:39:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Here's my basic understanding:
If you're out in public, people can take your picture, or even if you're on your property.
If you're in a store, or somewhere, the owners can request that they stop, or leave, but I think the photographers can still take pictures from outside, looking in, if they're still on public property.
If you're inside your house, you're getting close to peeping. I'm not sure if it's actually peeping, or you have to be nude, or something.
2006-09-08 13:00:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Paul 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Apparently not in CA, b/c someone took a picture up my skirt (while behind me in line in a drugstore) & the police (sheriffs actually) said, "Well, you weren't physically harmed, right?" F*&%in' a%^@oles!! Oh sure but if it was their mother, wife or daughter they'd have the whole swat team hunting down the pervert.
2006-09-08 12:54:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Steph 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope it is not illegal in and of itself in the U.S. It could be deemed as harrassment though.
Otherwise the stars would never have those "revealing" photo's showing up in the star rags all the time. hehe.
2006-09-08 12:56:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, illegal, go get the pervert!
2006-09-08 12:55:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes! It is illegal!
2006-09-08 12:58:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by GG 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you are in public they may take all the photos they wish.
2006-09-08 16:37:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not in America sweets.
2006-09-08 12:54:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by CaliCali 2
·
0⤊
0⤋