The H-Bomb/A-Bomb??

Question

Scientist say that an H-Bomb is thousands of times powerful than the A-Bomb, but what I want to know is how do they know that the H-Bomb is stonger than the A-bomb if it has never been used.

Answer 1

Two ways.

We know how much energy is going to be released by the fission of either Plutonium or Uranium in an atomic bomb and how much energy will be released in Hydrogen fusion in the H-bomb. You get a much greater quantity of energy from the fusion of hydrogen in the H-bomb than the fission of plutonium or uranium is a A-bomb. While this is an oversimplified explanation of what is actually happening, it should answer your question.

The fact that we have also tested both and realized very quickly that the H-bomb was significantly more powerful also would be a reason.

Answer 2

The H-bomb has been tested many times. The US exploded the Bravo test, which I believe was about a 15 MT explosion, or about 1000 times more powerful than the Hiroshima blast.

The Soviet Union exploded an even bigger bomb, somewhere around 50 MT.

Answer 3

H-bombs, neutronium bombs are the two nuclear bombs - they use the reliable nuclear tension to derive the flexibility of explosion. "anti-count" bomb does not make any experience...while a particle and it is anti-particle collide the result's some residual relax mass and an volume of power, however the quantity of power is low in line with particle and does not represent an "explosion:" of the nuclear bond breaking style...plenty extra power is liberated in a fission reaction between 2 nuclei than the exchange between a particle and it is anti-particle. So your question desires a great form of artwork.

Answer 4

Never "used' (in war) is a very different thing from "never tested".

Answer 5

They have... tested it. They haven't dropped it on any countries.
http://www.jaysnet.com/hydrogen-bomb.jpg