Your either with us or against us, don't be a terrorist.
2006-09-08 12:12:28 · 18 answers · asked by Dubya & The Brain 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
OK, so to be a real American, ignore the document that defines the country, and instead uphold the document that destroys it.
The truly patriotic American at his best.
(You silly, anyone who disagrees with anything Bush says is BY DEFINITION a terrorist who hates America; nuthin' no one can do 'bout it nohow. Didn't you get the memo?)
2006-09-08 15:58:08 · answer #1 · answered by tehabwa 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, this country was founded on specific principles which the USA Patriot Act violate. Therefore, to be a "real American" you would have to oppose the USA Patriot Act. We should not "screw upholding the constitution", as it is the best constitution and basis of government in the world.
2006-09-08 12:20:27 · answer #2 · answered by Infinity 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Forget all that. Uphold double mint gum.
Go Double Mint Go! I am now a Green Double Mint party supporter.
Paul K quoted on 9/7/06:
"Double Mint. Both the R and the D seem to attract the "extreme". I believe the answers are usually in the middle and I recognize the need for compromise. I also think it is important to know the person. When I vote, it is usually 1/4 R, 1/4 D, The remaining are Independent or left blank."
2006-09-08 12:20:48 · answer #3 · answered by Egroeg_Rorepme 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't have the time for that!! I'm occupied by A) supporting our troops and B) remembering 9/11. Last week I tried to attend a rally to ban condoms in schools and I forgot that 9/11 totally happened! And because I was also not simultaneously supporting our troops, the terrorists started hating our freedoms more!! Now they hate our freedoms too much and might try to attempt talking about harming someone!!! HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO BE MINDFUL OF THE PATRIOT ACT, TOO!!! THE TERRORISTS MIGHT WIN!!! SUPPORT OUR MUTHA F8CKIN SNAKES... I MEAN TROOPS!!
2006-09-08 12:17:20 · answer #4 · answered by fury1162 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The next logical step after the Patriot Act would be martial law...
2006-09-08 12:17:02 · answer #5 · answered by PoliSciFi 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Since the patriot act is, at most, a minor infraction on the constitution as a opposed to say... campaign finance reform by mccaine/fiengold...
what your point? I mean, besides blatantly construing the issue...
2006-09-08 12:15:39 · answer #6 · answered by Archer Christifori 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I know. The long lines at the Starbucks are a violation of the constitution! Whaaaaa
2006-09-08 12:17:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Bush can't do that!!! That was one of the 802 laws he slipped, and went well beyond his authority under the act until his secret banking taps were reported!
2006-09-08 12:16:19 · answer #8 · answered by cantcu 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
False dichotomy.
2006-09-08 12:14:20 · answer #9 · answered by AngiesHusband 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Dubya is my hero!!!........... tell all those ant-american, logiical people who know what is in the constitution to leave if they dont like it..!!!
2006-09-08 19:09:12 · answer #10 · answered by justaname80 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋