Saddam was not envolved in the planning support or exicution of 911
2006-09-08 12:06:19 · 15 answers · asked by 43 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Talk about ignorance in the US....would you believe this statistic: 43% of the American people still believe that Iraq was a sponsor of Alqueda.........................you can't get much less informed than that!!!!!! Bush still wants people to believe that Iraq was about the war on terroism.................only ignorant people still believe it......how sad that Bush cannot admit his errors.....sad day in our history.
2006-09-08 15:04:42 · answer #1 · answered by Cassie 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Cause Bush didn't pay them to shut up.
Wuzzup!
Go Double Mint Go! I am now a Green Double Mint party supporter.
Paul K quoted on 9/7/06:
"Double Mint. Both the R and the D seem to attract the "extreme". I believe the answers are usually in the middle and I recognize the need for compromise. I also think it is important to know the person. When I vote, it is usually 1/4 R, 1/4 D, The remaining are Independent or left blank."
2006-09-08 12:10:20 · answer #2 · answered by Egroeg_Rorepme 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
heavily do you think of he made it up basically he can invade a rustic and decrease his rankings and placed lives of such a lot of in possibility? it is ridiculous. they might have been misinformed or lie to yet no longer mendacity... And as properly we did no longer omit there basically because of the fact of WOMD's. Ever hear the single some affected person at well being middle x who those fairly dumb docs and nurses decrease the incorrect leg off of? anybody ever end to invite became into that a healthful leg from a splendidly healthful affected person? of direction the two legs have been meant to be bumped off and weren't clever however the media did no longer difficulty to let us know that. the tale sounds lots better in the event that they concentration on the adverse. by making use of the way, that guy is now strolling on golden legs paid for by making use of you and that i. think of approximately this the subsequent time you watch the information. they opt to get human beings watching them in stead of easily doing their very own study and searching out the info.
2016-10-14 11:48:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Where did Bush or anyone say that Saddam was involved with 911? Can you give us a source?
2006-09-08 12:14:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
In regards to CIA information about Ahmed Chalabi and the Iraq National Congress...Bush lied through he teeth...
2006-09-08 12:09:17 · answer #5 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Because for the past while Bush has had a Muslim extermination policy, and is trying to use every excuse in the book to achieve this goal.
2006-09-08 12:09:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Pay attention fool. There is a Senate Intelligence Committee (not a Republican or Democrap one). Senate Intelligence is an oxymoron.
They did not say he lied, the liberal Democraps said that.
This is typical liberal rehash of old material. Try and find something new please, this gets boring.
2006-09-08 12:11:30 · answer #7 · answered by Colorado 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
because he is the first president that makes me ashamed to be an american. yes he lied and is a liar and everyone knows he did
2006-09-08 12:08:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
his a fakin lier
tahts why
he knew sadam had no weapons, no link to 911, no nothink
soo he lied soo he ca get hsi litlle war
2006-09-08 12:08:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
They just told the truth.
2006-09-08 12:11:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋