English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

It's hard to say exactly what challenges are facing America. It's almost as if America has eliminated the challenges that were facing it, and went on to create new challenges just to keep it interesting.
If you are talking about terrorism, and it seems like you are, then it is obvious that we are creating terrorists faster than we can destroy them. They would both be responsible for creating terrorists, but Bush maybe a little bit more so than Osama.

I think Bush also holds a bit more responsibility for the erosion of our civil rights than Osama does. I don't think Osama really cares too much about our civil rights, whereas Bush clearly needs to reduce them if he wants to continue increasing his power.
From his perspective the challenge is clearly "How in the world are we ever going to get another Republican back into the White House after all this?" You can bet they are working on that one now.
High on my list of American Challenges is the question of how in the world are we ever going to be able to "get right" with the world. How can we make up for our transgressions and offenses? Someone should ask this question on Yahoo! Answers.
I'm not so sure I know what the true challenges are that are facing America. I have a feeling they are yet to be seen. But one thing is clear to me: the responsibility for whatever challenge we have to face is squarely in the hands of the American voters.

Bush has caused most of our difficulties and created most of our challenges, but I don't hold him responsible at all. He is not acting any differently than a reasonable voter could have expected him to act.

2006-09-08 12:00:59 · answer #1 · answered by Jude Scott 2 · 1 0

I'd say they both are responsible for the challenges facing America.
Osama Bin Laden for is attacts
and Bush did what he thought was best to go after him, but now Bush has taken it too far....

2006-09-08 11:44:13 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 1 0

George W. Bush.

2006-09-08 11:31:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Bush is as a lot a terrorist/mass assassin as FDR became for responding to eastern aggression or maybe (gasp) Nazi Germany at the same time as the U. S. wasn't even attacked promptly by technique of them. How, delusional do try to be to believe that Bush will be considered a mass assassin? On real of that, a million million human beings? On real of that, wondering the Midwest stands at the back of you (the Left coast, i ought to comprehend)? Who needs to imagine for themselves right here?

2016-11-06 22:24:32 · answer #4 · answered by bulman 4 · 0 0

Bush!

2006-09-08 11:30:18 · answer #5 · answered by BlackHearted 4 · 0 0

bin laden

2006-09-08 11:44:47 · answer #6 · answered by Eerin 6 · 0 0

Bill Clinton

2006-09-08 11:30:08 · answer #7 · answered by ? 7 · 0 1

it's in the Bush

2006-09-08 11:30:07 · answer #8 · answered by wil_t52 6 · 0 0

The American people and the failure to address all that we are responsible for from then to now, good and bad.

2006-09-08 11:29:48 · answer #9 · answered by vanamont7 7 · 0 1

r u kidding? Bush plain as day!!!

2006-09-08 11:29:15 · answer #10 · answered by daf-en-nee 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers