Does the DNC stand for censorship or free speech, now? Flip-flop..flop-flip?
http://reid.senate.gov/newsroom/record.cfm?id=262624&&year=2006&
"urging him to cancel...." Sounds like blatent censorship, and a threat to me.
2006-09-08 10:54:59 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Do all fish swim? Everyone knows that the communist party votes straight democrat ticket. Moveon.org is nothing more than a communist entity with their head, the currency destroyer, George Soros.
2006-09-09 04:39:47 · answer #1 · answered by John Skerry II 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Communism is essentially dead these days -- and debate over the ABC program doesn't have anything to do with communists. It's about the truth.
The Democrats who have complained about the ABC "docudrama" mini-series don't want to censor it.
Their contention -- and rightly so -- is that if ABC claims the program is based on the 9/11 Commission report (as ABC does), it should accurately reflect the information in the report.
Those who have seen it -- including members of the 9/11 Commission -- say that several scenes contradict the facts in the report. And that those scenes should either be fixed, or ABC should not say the program is based on the the report.
The Democrats aren't saying that they don't share any blame in the events leading up to the attacks on September 11. They're just saying that they shouldn't be blamed for things they didn't do or quoted as saying things they didn't say.
Members of the 9/11 Commission, a bi-partisan group appointed by Republicans, are saying the same thing.
2006-09-08 18:05:04 · answer #2 · answered by johntadams3 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
YES!!!! The democRATS have been taken over by communist front organizations such as moveon.org,
A.N.S.W.E.R. and other left wing groups. The reason why
they want to censor parts of the movie is it'll show that
Clinton was ineffective as a president and that he failed to follow thru on the bombings of the World Trade Center in 1993, the bombings of the 2 American Embassies in Africa, the bombing of the Kobar Tower in Saudi Arabia,
the bombing of the USS COLEin Yemen and several other Islamo-Fascist terrorist bombings against Americans
and other innocent people around the world.
2006-09-08 18:10:08 · answer #3 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Interesting, isn't it. When Oliver Stone or George Clooney falsify history to slander Conservatives it's called "dramatic license." When someone slanders Liberals, its called what it is: "falsifying history."
2006-09-08 18:01:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
The movie was made by one of Rush Limbaugh`s friends. Even Richard Clark former head of Anti-terrorist said the movie is shameful.
2006-09-08 18:00:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
"urging him to cancel" DOES NOT SOUND LIKE BLATANT CENSORSHIP...
FORCING HIM TO CANCEL would be blatant censorship...
apparently you can't see the difference...
urging someone to do something does not mean you are making them do something by the very definition of the word
2006-09-08 18:00:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Because it is a blatant lie, produced by a NRC operative, He says it is from the (/11 joint party hearings; but no Democratic input is in the film.
2006-09-08 17:59:47 · answer #7 · answered by Tommy D 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
well yes the dems are pinkos all pinkos support censorship and propoganda as long as it supports the commie way of thinking
2006-09-08 17:59:54 · answer #8 · answered by tp3bop 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
bubba is mad they are speaking the truth about what he did nothiing and set us up for 9/11 to happen
2006-09-08 17:59:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
because the historical facts of 9-11 are fabricated,,,
2006-09-08 17:56:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋