Why do Republican Senators always vote against bills that would give our troops better armour and supplies?

Question

Before you object do some research on rejected bills submited by Democrats. You will find that republicans have voted against bills that would call for investigation into the corruption of Haliburton and also endless bills meant to give our troops more armour and supplies vital to their well-being. Is that "Supporting our Troops"?

Maybe it's time you take a long hard look at your "support our troops" bumper stickers and think about whether our not your voting to help them or help Haliburton.

Answer 1

This is good point. I always like how the republicans are branded with the ones that care about the military because the increase defense spending. However, that money does not go to the troops or to help protect the troops. That money goes to defense contracts. People say Clinton dismantled the military, but I served in the Army under Clinton for 7 months and got two raises. So he lower spending on contract, but he did not forget the soldier.

Answer 2

Haliburton was used by Democrats during the 1990's, the no bid contract that was used in Iraq was put into effect in the 1990's. The investigation was a publicity stunt.
We should be using Haliburton in New Orleans, this way the Govt(corrupt Govt) down there could not get there hands on the money, and something would get done.

Answer 3

I think its time you took a hard look at those bills. How many bills are set forth for equipment for the troops, but are so full of pork for some democrats pet project. You would be best to be a little more open minded, dig a little deeper, and push for the line item veto. Republicans back up their support by the shear numbers of conservatives now serving in the military.

Answer 4

Some are not voting against troop supplies, they are voting against Pres. Bush. They are still fighting the 2000 election.

Some republicans are trying to distance themselves from Pres. Bush because they are more worried about getting reelected than earning their salaries.

Re: Haliburton -- they got the job because they were equipped to do it. If you ever find proof that Pres. Bush made one dime from it, take the proof to any newspaper. I'm sure they will pay you well for it.

The votes were counted, counted again, and recounted. Pres. Bush won. It's a fact.

Answer 5

particularly that it secure that "date" the troops may well be pulled back living house. Bush or the Republicans ought to no longer enable a bill that ought to tell the enemy how lots greater time they have in the previous the U. S. troops carry close their heads, wave white flags, and admit they are defeated. i won't have the ability to have faith Democrats might even arise with a bill that set a date. Oh, and by making use of the way, wasn't it stupid of them to comprise over 1000000000 (with a B) money properly worth of beef (which you probably did no longer desire suggested)? this is a notably hefty volume of beef barrel spending once you Democrats are so apprehensive approximately our fee selection and the deficit. Now you notice the way it gets in the crimson.

Answer 6

It occurs to me that the investigation into Halliburton's "corruption" was possibly attached as a rider to the bill to give our troops more and better armor and supplies. Thus you have a "poison pill" bill that when enacted would have certainly supplied the funding for our troops but would also have enacted legislation for an investigation into (and I used the term loosely) "corruption" by Halliburton. Thus the Republicans voted it down.

Answer 7

"Nice try, terrorist.
Your lies don't fool anyone."


1950 - Anyone who disagrees is a communist
2006- Anyone who disagrees is a terrorist

I wonder what's next?

I don't mind republicans... I don't. Both sides have idiots and intellectuals... What I hate... is that some of them.. who say support our troops... then don't give enough money to them to buy armour... or armourplating on their humvees....

So for those who close your mind to this man's argument... at least look around online and try to prove him wrong. That's what politics should be about, not just naming anyone who doesn't agree a communist or terrorist or gay. That's ridiculous.

Answer 8

Link???

Answer 9

I'll tell you why, the republicans don't care about this country. They are in it for the money, therefore don't want to spend any on those they dont care about!

Answer 10

You are very right. Perhaps we should elect people who have served our country or who have relatives serving our country.