You sound like a decent person and you raise a question that has been asked since ancient times. The rich value their money above all other things – so they will not share it with what they consider to be ‘lesser’ humans – unless they give to charity and use that as a tax right-off.
Why aren’t healthy ‘fathers’ supporting those families? Maybe people assume that the women are cheap and do not know who the fathers’ are. Yet men do expect women to have sex in a relationship – even when the men do not promise to provide for them in the event of pregnancy… Are we women digging our own graves when we have sex so easily with men who do not even ‘believe’ that it is their responsibility to support a family married or otherwise?
When it comes to a poor woman with a child it comes down to women’s roles. The jobs that woman have traditionally done – have always been the least appreciated. Look at the people who said that these women ‘do not work’ in their answers. !!!!!! Is there anything more ridiculous than that? Caring for a baby IS WORK! It is not really feminism that has undermined the role – it is chauvinism. Feminists simply wanted to see women respected in the roles that they had, and since dump the kids off at daycare seems to be more respected that is what they fought for ‘secular’ work. WOMEN DO WORK – they just don’t always ‘get pay’ or recognition for the work that they do!!!!
We live in an ugly, greedy world. The rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Callous mothers are usually more successful – now that being a mother is not a JOB. And the rich do not even understand the meaning of the term ‘working poor.’ Those people who do have paid jobs and work long hours but do not have the money to make ends meets.
Many of the poor women and children out there have WEATHLY husbands/fathers who have moved on to prettier/younger/trampy woman. The one disrespected is the one left in poverty – not the husband and his new bride. That is how a man’s world works. That is how a greedy world works.
2006-09-08 10:15:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Many people who are rich probably worked very hard for/or were very smart with their money. Why should they have to give it up to those who are less fortunate than they are? It was not their choice to go out and have babies...and it's not their responsibility to take care of the babies in the world..just because they may be less fortunate. This is a ridiculous question. I'm guessing you are/or may someday be a Democrat huh? Not everything in life should be handed to people...
2006-09-08 10:03:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by vdubbchick 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Because if they didn't have babies they might not be as poor as they are.
Why should you have to give your money to someone who was less responsible and mature as you? Would you do it?
If you were rich, would you share everything you had equally with those who made no attempt to earn a living or couldn't handle their own personal lives with any responsibility?
If so, the world would come to a stop because welfare would bankrupt the economy. No one would work, because we would expect rich people to give us money.
What would you do when the rich people gave all of their money away and there were none left? What then?
2006-09-08 09:54:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by drumrb0y 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
First of all rich people take care of there own. people who have a lots of money have a lot of bills too they rotate this money that is why they are successful. Our responsibility is to take care and love our children material things come and go. But loving your kids are forever. Everyone lives different and has a different sight on some issues you can't make a person take care of someone that they do not want to. That is why families need to stick together and take care of each other
2006-09-08 09:55:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by Cheryl M 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
It's not their responsibility to give the less fortunate money. If people have starving babies, they are the ones that need to be providing for them. Not some rich guy. Go get a job and take care of your baby, yourself!
2006-09-08 09:55:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Stryker 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
properly, Mr. mendacity, i'm no longer particular what you're speaking about. each body i have met who's been there look to have loved China and the persons. Yeah, each so often we may ***** about issues we're not acquainted with love squat lavatories or no longer with the ability to drink water with out boiling it first, yet it truly is not any longer an analogous as "searching down on people in China." there are a multitude of issues in eu international places or the Americas that chinese travelers can ***** about too. with the help of how, you're in contact to maintain in mind that it truly is something of a 2-way highway. to illustrate, even as i bypass right into a touch community eating position with my fiance i do not savour being "regarded down upon" even as the owner or his spouse supplies me a menu in English and that i see that the costs are double what's on my fiance's menu. And we also run into circumstances the position my fiance will be chatting with someone on a custom or at excursion website, and a stranger will presume i'm a temporary boyfriend or something and propose strategies for her to tear me off. Yeah! it truly is occurred more desirable than once! This week she finally defined to me with great embarrassment why, each so often, she with out word starts shouting at some human being lets basically met.
2016-11-25 21:03:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by chittenden 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
because poor people usually have MORE babies. its kind of an oxymoron in sense. one would think the rich would have more babies because they can afford too and the poor would have less. but that's not so. so basically in a sense if rich people give poor money, than poor people are just gonna have more kids whom they can't care for properly. technically they're poor in the first place because they can't retain money well, so they aren't gonna retain the money given to them either.
2006-09-08 10:02:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by ShaneA 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
there are govment programs for people who need help I am not rich I am paycheeck to paycheek too. There are rich people who put there money into chiritys. And some people just use the system! so people like us get look down on I know alot of rich people and they are nice to me I think its the poor people looking down on the rich people so it goes both ways
2006-09-08 11:42:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by black lady 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
They don't give money because they don't have a responsibility to support other people's children. If poor people can't afford to have kids then they have the option of birth control at a number of free/low cost places - like planned parenthood.
2006-09-08 09:53:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by Rawrrrr 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
in many cases, sad to say but nevertheless true, poor people either will not practice birth controle and can give no logical reason why not.. their are those to who deliberately have more children in order to recieve public aid. something else to consiter is that many able bodied people will now work a all. it is very hard for a common laboring man to make ends meet nowdays svsn under the best of circumstances, ritch people realise this situation is going on here in this country today and that is one reason they will not contribute. many ritch people have ben hounded for contributions for so many worthless, idiotic causes they have grown caloused to worthwhile charities. this is the best i can figure this queston out. i am from a poor working family myself. before we married my wife and i agreed to only one child, then sterilaziton for one or both of us. unfortunately we have had no children we both love children. i am sorry to hear you are childless, unless you have intentionaly delayed having children as yet
2006-09-10 10:13:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by houdini 3
·
0⤊
1⤋