I've heard them say that Clinton's bl0wj0b was impeachable. But the only person who was hurt was Hilary. Why would I care if a guy would get a *******? Not my business.
But that's all over and done with. So now, why is it so hard for us to impeach Bush for leaking the name of a covert CIA operative? Bush even said it was illegal.
SO what's up?
2006-09-08 08:30:29 · 18 answers · asked by dewdropinn 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Well, no one wanted to impeach Clinton because he got a bj, but because he committed perjury which is a crime. Bush can't be impeached for leaking Valerie Plames name, because a. the investigation showed her not to be covert and b. there's no evedience that Bush was behind it. As a matter of fact the real culprit has been uncovered this past week, clearing the administration.
2006-09-08 08:35:13 · answer #1 · answered by MEL T 7 · 5⤊ 4⤋
Bush has money that is the only reason he is called our President to start with.
George W. Bush is a moran. He should be impeached and executed for high treason of the United States of America.
Hes too stupid to think, he paid his way through elementry, middle, high school. and college, if not he would be stuck in the first grade!
He was never elected either time. He LOST the popular vote TWICE!
2006-09-09 18:18:45 · answer #2 · answered by Jeremy© ® ™ 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
1.) Clinton was not impeached for his sexual acts. He was impeached for lying to a Grand Jury. This is a federal crime called Perjury. This crime is why Clinton was impeached.
2.) Bush did not leak Plame's name. It was Richard Armitage, he confessed and it has been all over the news the last week. What rock have you been under?
3.) What's up is that you are completely ignorant. Thankfully, this can be fixed. All you have to do is pay attention and educate yourself. Don't listen to the "talking heads" on tv, and don't believe everything you read on the internet. You must pay attention and get your information from reliable sources.
There is hope for you, if you are willing to do what it takes to educate yourself.
2006-09-08 15:48:28 · answer #3 · answered by Aegis of Freedom 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
The President didn't leak any name and Scooter Libby didn't either, It was a guy named Armatage and the prosecuting attorney (Fitzgerald) knew it all along. The woman had a desk job she wasn't in covert status. It was just the democraps causing the country problems like usual!
As far as slick willie getting a bj, I could care less, but for him to get it in the White House was wrong and very disrespectful to OUR NATION!
Hillary hurt,I don't think so,she was probably @ the other end doing her thing!
They need to charge Sandy Berger with stealing federal documents from Our federal building in DC. Remember that,They had him on video stuffing papers about 911 down his pants, He was clintons guy!
2006-09-08 15:43:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Clinton was impeached in 1999 not for his personal exploits, but for lying under oath to a grand jury (He could not be charged with lying on television - "I did not have sex with that woman..." - to the American people), and those who acquitted him had to lie in oder not to impeach, because the fact of his actually lying is absolutely factual (That he lied is an historical fact; no one disputes it; his defense is that the Republicans were gunning for him.)
Much more than somebody's wife was hurt. When the Commander in Chief cannot be trusted what remains of democracy? Isn't democracy based on accountability?
By the way, I was a Democrat in 1999.
2006-09-08 15:46:14 · answer #5 · answered by voltaire 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Clinton was impeached for LYING. Get it straight.
Bush did NOT leak the name of a covert CIA operative. 1 - She was NOT covert. 2 - She and her husband leaked her own career on their own in "Who's Who." 3 - It has to be an intentional leak in order to do harm. Replying, "Yes, I've heard that," when someone says, "I think his wife works for the CIA," is not an intentional leak meant to do harm. STRIKE THREE - you're out!
2006-09-08 15:34:19 · answer #6 · answered by FozzieBear 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Well, I'm a Democrat. I don't think Bush should be impeached. He didn't break any laws. He's just not the right man for the job at this point in history.
2006-09-08 15:37:04 · answer #7 · answered by Overt Operative 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
1. It wasn't the oral sex, it was him making a false sworn statement. After all this time only the terminally stupid do not know this.
2. Bush has done nothing that warrants impeachment despite all the howling from leftist liberal braindead Michael Moore fans.
3. Bush didn't leak squat, do you watch anything other than MTV?
2006-09-08 15:36:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
Get your head out of your *ss! Armitage leaked Plame's name, not anyone in the Bush Admin. You're trying to perpetuate a lie that has just recently blown up in the democrats face.
Bush will not only never be impeached, he might actually end up on Mt. Rushmore once history justifies his war to keep us safe and fools like you are finally forgotten.
2006-09-08 15:38:39 · answer #9 · answered by caesar x 3 · 1⤊ 5⤋
Yes, if GW had committed all the crimes he is accused of by you libertards, he would have already been impeached. Trouble is, you got to have proof, and proof is something you do not have. Lies, yes-proof,no. Even if you have proof, you probably will not get him out of office until his time is up. Why? Just look at what happened to _low Job Bill and his perjury.
2006-09-08 15:36:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋