Who would win in a fight Star wars or Star Trek?

Question

Simply put...who would win if both galaxies dueled off star wars or star trek

seems to be alot of people who think star wars

yeah the U.S.S. enterprise is one mean ship

i dont believe that han solo...my thing is is that the trek ships have shields not o mention the death star isnt a fast firing device it could tkae out one ship at a time...not to mention the star trek ships have torpedos and lasers that focus and hit ships so not only would they take out things liek the falcon in one hit they would also be able to target them

Answer 1

star trek would win hands down.

star trek came out in the late 60's early 70's
star wars came out in the late 70's early 80's
star trek was first man.

most people when asked a question like yours respond in one of these ways

1Q. In Star Wars, weapons are rarely, if ever, set on stun.

1A.all that this means is that star warians are murderous savages, they do have a stun setting but they only used it once in all the episodes (episode four at the beginning when the empire captures Pricess Leia) one faction of which is a fascist dictator ran empire.

2Q. The Enterprise needs a big engineering section with an anti-matter unit and normally requires a large crew to go into warp. The Millennium Falcon does the same thing with just R2-D2 and a Wookie.

2A. the enterprise is many times larger than the millenium falcon. this is like comparing a shuttle craft to the defiant. also the enterprise doesn't need to be repaired for fifteen minutes movie time (3 minutes our time) or longer every time the pilot decides he needs go into hyperspace (warp speeds). the enterprise is actually maintained by a group of professionals.

3Q. After resisting torture from an Imperial interrogation droid and Darth Vader, Princess Leia still looked fresh and desirable. After pithy Cardassian starvation torture, Picard looked like hell.

3A. leia was drugged and questioned maybe with a little bit of electronic mindprobing. picard was physically and emotionally tortured.

4Q. One word: Light sabers.

4A. easily made using a phaser and a force field projector. also easily stopped using a force field or shields, personal versions of both exist that can protect the whole body and be worn as an arm band.

5Q. Two words, THE FORCE

5A. One LETTER - "Q". more specifically entire Q Continuem

6Q. Darth Vader could choke the entire Borg Collective to death with a single glance and a gesture.

6A. the borg collective do not breath, so what good would it be to choke them?

7Q. The Death Star doesn't give a **** if a world is "Class M" or not.

7A. what would be the point of blowing up a planet nobody lives on? people only live on class M planets.

8Q. Luke Skywalker isn't obsessed with ******* every alien chick he encounters (just his twin sister).

8A. his "twin" "sister" enough said.

9Q. Jabba the Hutt would eat Harry Mudd for trying to cut in on his action.

9A. the Klingons would think Jabba the Hutt is some form of Gahh'

10Q. The United Federation of Planets would have to liberate any ship named "Slave I".

10A. no clue how to answer.

11Q. Picard pilots the Enterprise through asteroid fields at 1/4 impulse power. Han Solo floors it.

11A. Picard only needs two thrusters and the gravity wells of the asteroids themselves. Han Solo needs engines. who's the better pilot?

12Q. you don’t have to set star wars ships to go warp speed, they already are

12A. but they don't go anywhere near as fast as the enterprise does.

13Q. can anyone actually understand klingon? But plenty of people can roar like chewy

13A. but who needs to roar like chewy when you have a universal translator.

14Q. darth vader and darth maul could kick the whole enterprise's crew combined

14A. first thing they boarded the enterprise they would be met by a security team that would proceed to trap them between force fields and then would energize them to the brig or into space.

15Q. If you watch star trek today,your automaticly a geek. people will at least here you out if you watch star wars

15A. star trek is atleast based on real science and scientific theories.

now most of those are of no point what so ever.
and then there are the arguments that rely on techno-babble.

1. USS Enterpise vs. Death Star
the Death Star's laser would be unable to penetrate the Enterprise's Duetranium(Duranium) Hull. enterprise has Phasers and Photon Torpedoes.
Enterpise wins

2. USS Defiant vs. Millenium Falcon
highly manuverable warship versus slower basically harmless smuggling freighter.
Defiant wins

3. Q vs. Sith vs. Jedi
Q all powerful immortal gods
Sith and Jedi semi-powerful mortals
Q wins

4. Q vs. Emperor Palpatine
This is truly a no-brainer.
1.) Q is omnipotent; the Emperor is not. Advantage: Q

2.) Q is capable of multiple costume changes. The Emperor has thusfar shown only the oh-so-fashionable black gurney sack. Mentos-edge to Q.

3.) Q is omnipotent, capable of reshaping space and time. The Emperor is neither immortal nor possessing god-like powers. Umm, advantage: Q.

4.) The Emperor has appeared in three Star Wars movies. (Empire, Return, and that other recently released Hollywood bowel-movement) Q has appeared yearly across three Star Trek series. (Next Gen, DS9 & Voyager) Advantage: Q, on the weight of numbers, so we go to the tiebreaker: Q has NOT appeared in any of the abominations that are the Star Trek movies. The Emperor appeared in The Phantom Menace. Advantage: Q.

5.) Q is omnipotent; only another Q is capable of affecting his powers or harming him. The Emperor is not, and was killed by a middle aged man with one hand chopped off, who simply tossed him down a long shaft. Let's think about this carefully folks. Advantage? Q.

6.) After watching the Star Trek episodes with Q, everybody wanted to be Q. (total power, no responsibility? Sign me up. Who wouldn't want to be a walking ominipotent pile of id?) After watching the Star Wars movies, no one wanted to be the Emperor. Who wants to be a crusty old guy who can't even beat down whiney Mark Hamill enough to shut him up. If you can still whine and beg your evil, just-tried-to-kill-you father while you're being shocked by lightning, someone is obviously running on a very low battery. Police tazers can usually render someone incoherent from pain and muscle spazams. Advantage: Q.

7.) Q IS OMNIPOTENT. Rock may beat scissors, scissors may cut paper, and paper may wrap wrock, but (and this is a no brainer) TURNING SOMEONE INTO A COLLIE OR SNAPPING YOUR FINGERS AND TELEPORTING THEM INTO THE MIDDLE OF THE SUN BEATS THE HOLY HELL OUT OF SNEERING AND TRYING TO GOOSE SOMEONE WITH SPARKS OUT OF YOUR FINGERTIPS! Advantage: anyone, anyone, Anakin? Q!

are you going to vote for a guy who wears a black bathrobe and has jowls, or somebody who knew the best role in Robin Hood wasn't Robin, it was the Sheriff of Nottingham. Think about it.

Outcome: Q in a snap. - dok
Q wins.

5. star trek spans the time frame from the 1900s to the 3100s
also it covers the entire milky-way galaxy which is much larger than the star wars galaxy. (magnitude of 100)
star wars spans the time of two generations and covers the sculptor galaxy (magnitude of 7) and its sister galaxy (magnide of 2 to 3).
winner Star Trek

Basically what ever the argument is, Star Trek wins hands down.

startrek has almost unlimited resources.
threat Defense
tie fighters http://deltafleet.mbenzvi.com/tech/valkyrie.htm
death star tholian web

Answer 2

I’m a huge Star Wars fan, and put it this way Star Trek would win. But it would probably win out of only have the one option left. See Star Wars has the fighters, the battle stations the guns and all that stuff, but Star Trek has Genesis which is small enough to be able to fit on any and every ship the in the Star Trek universe this would kill ever living thing on the planet. And I know the death star can destroy a planet but that take time to move that weapon.

Answer 3

Federation curb stomps the Empire. Lets compare;
1-Technology. Star Trek is based on real science. Things portrayed in ST are in use today! Tablet?, Bluetooth, Random Access Memory, MRI, I could go on.Real si fi with the emphasis on science. By comparison SW tech is ancient. ST has transporters, replicators able to build whatever they need in an instant, advance sorce field technology including deflector shields; even metephasic shielding that can enable a ship to withstand the heat, radiation, gravity and presure of a tellar corona! so even a blast from the Death Star's primary weapon would't even dent the Enterprise's shields.Add to the fact that ST ship hull plating is resistant to Laser fire (phasers are not the same as lasers or blasters, which is superheated ionized gas) Standard shielding can protect them. By contrast SW ships have no EFFECTIVE shielding. Its mentioned but based on what is portrayed it would not withstand a federation attack. Remember how Han Solo made the bridge of a star destoyer duck? No shields! a single quantum torpedo is all it would take to cripple a star destroyer. Destroyer armament is not sufficient to match the fire power of a starfleet cruiser, which is armed to fight similar ships of its class. The enterprise D wwas able to destroy 20% of a Borg cube with only 3 shots of ite main phaser array, so it would make very short work of a star destroyer. And forget about fighters!TIE fighters would just splatter on their deflector shield like bugs on a windshield.More on this subject ater on.
2 Battle tactics. centuries of conflict with the Klingons, Romulons, Borg, and Dominion have honed and perfected star fleet.Star fleet officers are creative thinkers, true proffesionals amd work as a team. Diversity is their strenth. They are soldiers and diplomats all in one.They are backed up by science officers and engineers.They have more than one way to defeat and enemy. Starfleet medical will find a way to negate midichlorions and therfore the force. engineers will set up dampening field to block the force.If they had too, they would enlist, arm and train the rebel alliance.By contrast, both the empire and the rebels have poor tactics. why fly your fighters directly into the line of fire of imperial walkers?As for the empire and their supposed military might, I have only one thing to say: EWOKS!
3- Longevity. The empire waxed and waned in under 25 years. the federation spanned centuries, from the late 21st century into the 29th century. by that time they had mastered time travel. Yet another technological advantage. The federation adaptes, learns, innovates, improvises and ovecomes. The empire does the same thing over and over again, expecting different results! Anyone who can deassimilate borg drones would have no problems with stormtroopers.In fact, most stormtroopers would gladly change sides...
4- Bettere ships No star destoyer has the maneuverability of a star fleet ship. The enterprise would litterally fly cicle around a star destroyer and carve it up with phaser fire. they can easily steer clear of the death star primary weaponand lay down devastating fire upon it.They can beam in boarding parties to sabotage the station, or just download a computer virus to shut the whole thin down.Want total destruction? Detonate a genesis device in the Death stars core. Bom! Instant star system made from the left over parts of a planet killer! Or better yet, Create a quantum singularity nearby and watch the imperial fleet get sucked inside!
I could continue, but you get the Idea. The dark sude of the forv=ce will not help the emporor or his empire. The Federation Klingon, and Romulon flags will flap in the wind on the planet Corrusant!
LIVE LONG,AND PROSPER.

Answer 4

Star Trek universe would definitely win - why? Better technology & better alliances. ST has replicators, transporters, holodecks, the Federation w/ the Klingon Alliance, Betazoids that can read minds, the Breen which could easily live on Star Wars's planet Hoth...Star Wars just has lightsabers and the force, which is what, little microbes? Dr. Crusher would eliminate those in seconds with some nanites and a hypospray!

Answer 5

Star Trek has obviously been around longer, but three newest Star Wars movies had major CG. What awesome things they made look real...was...well...AWESOME!

I used to watch Star Trek: The Next Generation all the time, but I didn't see all the Star Trek movies that went into theaters as I did with Star Wars.

Answer 6

Star wars if the death star wars there then star trek is dead right off. Star trek has few small fighters mostly just shuttle craft so there weapons arent desinged to fight small fighters. So if a you have X-wings, Y-wings, A-wings, B-wings, Tie fighters, the millenium falcon all pounding thier ships there is know way star trek could defeat them. If it was capital ships fighting each other ot would be closer but star wars would still win. The only real challeng star wars would have is against the borg, but I still think they would win

Answer 7

Star Wars

Answer 8

Star Trek.

The Star Wars universe has no match for the U.S.S. Enterprise. The Enterprise would destroy every wimpy ship in Star Wars.

As far as captains, Kirk would take out Solo in a heartbeat.

(Picard is a weenie, being french, as usual, he was always surrendering to everyone. so if was a fight between him and SW, Wars would probably win it.)

Kirk would take D Vader and kick his *** from one side of the galaxy to the other.

Answer 9

Star Trek all the way. They have much better technology. They also have stronger alliances. The people on Star Trek have more diverse abilities and strengths. They are not all relying on the force.

Answer 10

Lets see, Star Wars have: Death Star, Force, Lightsabers, Chewbacca.

Star Trek has: Phasers, A robot, The guy from Reading Rainbow.

Star Wars would totally annihilate them in every aspect of fighting.

Kirk could fire a phaser at Obi, but Obi would just deflect it back at him.

Answer 11

Well taking in consideration that I have never seen a star wars movie or watched a full episode of star trek, I would probably say star wars because my old roomate says that star wars is the sh!t.