Not all of them. Hitler was not Muslim. But nowadays islamists are responsible for every terror act in the world. Name one where they weren't involved?
From Middle East, to Madrid, London, New York, Bali, India, Pakistan - it's all them.
Bunch of cowardly pricks!
2006-09-08 07:13:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Michael R 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
They aren't. just the ones for which they were actually responsible, which is most of the terrorist acts in the past 30 years. This is observable fact, not just name-calling.
Why? Because that's what their religion is aimed at--taking over the world. So why does it bother them so much to hear the truth spoken? That's the question. Afraid somebody will wake up and get a clue before they're finished?
You know, if you're planning on conquering the world, you have to expect a certain amount of resentment, not to mention opposition, but you certainly can't afford to have tender feelings for your public image.
2006-09-08 14:23:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by kaththea s 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Being accused and being responsible are two different things. I agree, though. Most of the fighting and terror in the world over the last 10-15 years is carried out by Islamist nut jobs....and they admit it and brag about it.
2006-09-08 14:18:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
As far as terrorism is concerned ... it's because they usually ARE guilty. Since when are Muslims being accused of "all crimes"?
2006-09-08 14:17:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by smallweed 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
they are involved in most if not all wars
2006-09-09 02:46:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by acid tongue 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
because of bush and the jews
2006-09-08 14:56:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ignorance, fear and lack of understanding.
2006-09-08 14:17:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by ElOsoBravo 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
absolutely no
2006-09-12 09:44:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by david w 5
·
0⤊
0⤋