This case has gone unsolved for years while OJ is living it up in Florida. Something went terribly wrong in this court case when the jury returned a not guilty! Clearly the evidence eas there.
2006-09-08 06:55:51 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
I dont think OJ did it---but I do think he had a LOT to do with it and was there when it happened
2006-09-08 06:57:32 · answer #1 · answered by Rez 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
LOL... It's funny that you asked. O.J is the killer. Problem is the overwhelming publicity due to his celebrity and impact on football. Then you fact in a white woman and man, possibly killed by a black man.....you smell controversy? The truth is without a doubt, all the evidence pointed in his direction, but the planting of evidence blew the entire case. You think they would allow him to be convicted with planted evidence. THe blacks would have screamed injustice. We all know what was to follow (see: Rodney King). Could he have gotten convicted, sure could have. Would they convict him criminally, nope because of the tampering with evidence which was almost a guaranteed dismismal. Further proof, under the double jeopardy law he was protected from in re trail or further punishment criminal. But, for someone who is innocent, he lost in civil court. So if he was truly innocent, a case in civil court would not hold water. I said all that to say, "The Juice" did it!!!!!!!!!!
2006-09-08 07:24:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
O.J. did it. surely a experienced, specialist athlete might want to slaughter 2 youthful, more desirable wholesome those with a machete. His reaction afterwards (defiantly refusing to administration the police throughout the time of that well known experience down the l. a. throughway, the astounding lack of demonstrable grief and regret for the homicide of one of his intimates and finally the hollow words he spoke about "monitoring down the killers"-it truly is 13 years later, OJ-discover 'em yet?-are all indicative of a weak guy with an severe experience of entitlement. although if those "trophies" were stolen, you do not motel to "self-help," i.e., taking the be counted into your own fingers even as armed. it truly is what the police are for. Simpson is that kind of man or woman that we individuals are starting to be further and extra attentive to now that there is three hundred million people swarming about: someone with no moral experience. truly risky. he's accountable. Now we've were given to face the ordeal of Al Sharpton and God surely is acquainted with who else, suggesting that's a function of innate American racism, and in no way the "lengthy on of the regulation." In different words, their very own racism.
2016-11-25 20:50:02 · answer #3 · answered by mckuhen 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
OJ did it and this is an instance of having money helping you a whole lot
2006-09-08 07:03:24 · answer #4 · answered by Podiatristdja 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
OJ did. just like the whole world knows Michael Jackson is a child molestor.
2006-09-08 07:02:46 · answer #5 · answered by amylr620 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
oj all the way .the jury ways payed off i think to keep a race riot from happening
2006-09-08 06:59:17 · answer #6 · answered by droid 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
O.J. Simpson did it. Poor prosecutors and slick defense attorneys along with the celebrity of the defendant all contributed to his acquittal. Justice did not prevail in this case.
2006-09-08 06:58:46 · answer #7 · answered by kksay 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
oj had the money to stay out of kaill plane and simple
2006-09-08 06:57:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
OJ, but he played it smooth and massaged the system. WTG OJ
2006-09-08 07:33:22 · answer #9 · answered by Shrek o 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Clearly nobody knows hence, the case being unsolved.
2006-09-08 06:59:10 · answer #10 · answered by RACQUEL 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋