Those animals will go to a special animal hell. I know this because the Bible teaches me to hate everything that isn't just like me....
2006-09-08 06:50:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Bobby W 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Because they are animals maybe and we have evolved well beyond that. After all we use a bathroom they just go where they want. Have you ever been to a zoo and visited the Monkey cage and witness the things they do for public viewing. Becuase the satisfy themselves in front of everyone should it be OK for mankind to do the same thing? Homosexuality is wrong because it states so in the bible. I don't know of any animal the can read let alone interpert the words of God. If you find one I think it would be straight and not do provocotive things in public.
2006-09-08 06:54:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by smarques074 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
I am not sure where your beliefs stand in asking this question. A Christian knows that God created man from the dust of the earth and only spoke the rest of creation, including animals into existence. God gave "humans" dominion over the animals. Human beings are not in the same class as animals we were created in the likeness of God and we live by a completely different set of rules. If you prefer to behave like an animal, that is your business. God did not give the animals the 10 commandments to live by or the Bible to study, He gave that to us.
2006-09-08 06:58:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ask 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think homosexuality in animals could be more of a dominance thing! Maybe it just does not matter to them!!!! Maybe they know something we don't know! What's wrong with homosexuality? Feel the love people! It could be everywhere...if so many freak'n people were not so concerned about other people's life styles...what a wonderful world this would be! Hmmm...I'll check out the link now! Thanx............
2006-09-08 06:54:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Goobean 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, animal observations is not any sufficient evidence to finish something about homosexuality. My concern with people declaring "homosexuality is organic," is that there is basically about no longer something time-honored about the sexual orientation. All researcher's have reported, is they do no longer trust it to be a decision. "Umm, those are some detrimental habit of individuals of the animal kingdom that you stated. " there is not any such ingredient as a "detrimental habit" interior of the different species besides people. maximum species have habit that are guided with the help of their instincts on my own. even as conversing about animals like the bat,owl,or fowl, there is not any sturdy or undesirable habit. to assert that a spider has a "undesirable habit" of ingesting it truly is youthful, might want to be incorrect.
2016-11-25 20:48:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by allotey 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Most times in nature, the animals are showing male dominance. It is usually not like the homosexuality of humans.
2006-09-08 06:50:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Nep-Tunes 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
First of all Wikpedia is hardly what I would call a realiable source. Second, while I have heard this argument by the homosexual community, the instances in which is occurs in nature are hardly compelling in number, and there is no reason to think that statistical abnormalities are the exlusive province of humans. Finally, your assertion simply does not follow. Fish sometimes eat their young. Does that make it alright for us to cannabalize children when it suits us? Oh, come to think of it, that is acceptable in the left where abortion and destroying fetuses for stem-cell research is not morally reprehensible. Please accept my apologies. I forgot to whom I was speaking.
2006-09-08 06:57:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by anonymourati 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
First.... wikipedia is not a valid reference. It's peer/community written.
Second.... There are multitudes of things that are common in the animal kingdom that are considered wrong.
Killing our young that are genetically inferior.
Abandoning our family to fend for themselves as a method of strengthening them.
Mating by strength only.
Only the strong survive.
Get a clue, we are not comparable to the animal kingdom.
2006-09-08 06:52:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who said it is wrong?
Oh yea, them. The Indians called them two spirits and thought it was a blessing. Missionaries can change all that. Thank you.
Yes it is natural. Happens in primitive situations too..so it isn't really a bunch of spoiled brats acting out or making bad choices.
2006-09-08 06:54:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by justwondering 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
animals engage in dominant states not homosexual behavior. A dog will mount another dog to show its dominance not to engage in sexual intercourse. Animals only endulge in intercourse to propagate. Do they have pleasure, sure they do. but they do not mate with other male animals as this would be contrary to the way God made them, including me and you.
2006-09-08 06:54:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by deegayle4me 2
·
0⤊
0⤋