Michael Moore's interpretation made the republicans look like the bad guy. Speculation about the ABC series points fingers at the Clinton Adminstration, making the democrats look bad. Since it is okay to blame the republicans for everything that goes wrong with the country, democrats are very upset that some blame will be shifted their way through airing this mini-series.
2006-09-08 06:48:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by neesy01 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
[Dems LOVED Michael Moores Movie about 911. Yet ABC attempts to show another angel on it. And you go nuts. You go so far as to demand they don't run it WHY?]
Republicans wanted to censor that anti Regan movie so both sides hate free speech
Kevin do you belive in the Liberal media.
2006-09-08 13:46:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Skeeter 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are being childish.
Its not about Dems and Rep.....its about making a movie that blatantly lies.
Michael "Maniac" Moore doesn't say his movie is based on the 9/11 commission report and purposefully change key parts.
A blatant lie is blatant lie.
If you want to compare movies, Fahrenheit 911 and Fahrenhype 911 would be a better comparison.
2006-09-08 13:50:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Totally different situation. No matter which you agree with, Michael Moore's movie . . . I assume you mean Fahrenheit 9-11 . . . was shown in movie theatres, not on free public television! This movie is being shown on a major public television network. Recall that when one of the networks planned to show a similar movie about Ronald Reagan, Republicans complained about it's content and it was ultimately cancelled!
2006-09-08 13:51:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by worldinspector 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The two are not in the same class. The ABC show is a fictious reenactment. Michael Moore's movie was a documentary. Big difference.
2006-09-08 13:49:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Democrats loved Michael Moore's lies about America.
But Democrats must cover-up the truth about the Clinton adminstration and 9/11.
2006-09-08 13:47:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Perhaps it's because Moore's movie was well documented while ABC makes stuff up.
2006-09-08 13:46:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Brand X 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
To poster: I'm a dem and I have no problem with it whatsoever. Generalize much?
To responders: Wow. Y'all are just filled with hatred, aren't ya?
P.S. It's angle, not angel.
2006-09-08 13:52:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by HoneyGirl 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Libs only agree with free speech when the speech upholds their thoughts....this movie did not...so naturally, the right to free speech is moot for this movie.....damn socialist party
2006-09-08 13:46:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
ABC admits their movie is fictitious.....
while Moore's movie has yet to be proved inaccurate......
and if you believe it is inaccurate.... give me one example.... cmon just one!!!!!!
2006-09-08 13:49:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋