Hitler is dead. He can't harm anymore. For me it's OSAMA
2006-09-08 06:21:20 · 14 answers · asked by Smooth talking 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
i read alot about Hitler. He killed 5 million jews. Osama kills childrens and anybody irrespective of thier ethnicity. Osama is more terrible.
2006-09-08 06:52:19 · update #1
Believe you me If osama was at the helm of power. He'd kill more than anybody else times 10. Look at the situation in Iraq.
2006-09-08 06:54:23 · update #2
Hellooooooo!! during world war 2 Hitler Didn't kill them all. The allies and the enemy Both DID>
2006-09-08 06:56:24 · update #3
Hello mike bin ladins al quaeda organ is still in iraq.
2006-09-08 07:19:00 · update #4
They are both bloody killers. A person who kills 2,500 in Newyork, people is as guilty as person who killed 5 million. Oh it's true it's true.
2006-09-08 11:31:07 · answer #1 · answered by Agentj100 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't think Osama would do what Hitler did to the people. I often have wondered if Osama would kill me (white american) if I was walking in the desert. I often wonder if he has killed anyone with his two hands. I think he has a bigger problem with American gov than just the race like Hitler did. Scary similarities are the zealot factor. Hitler to had some wild idea of what he thought was to take place.
The sadness is how many more peopl eneed to die. How many more US presidents will do as Bush and how many more Osamas will do such actions.
2006-09-08 13:29:51 · answer #2 · answered by Labatt113 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hitler might be dead, but he's still worse. He (and the Imperial Japanese military) was responsible for WWII which resulted in the deaths of 50 million people. Osama is a monster too, but he doesn't come close to the destruction that Hitler brought upon the world.
2006-09-08 13:24:57 · answer #3 · answered by Paul H 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hitler was worse by far. He killed Jews, Gypsies, Non-Whites, and anyone with anytype of handicap. Osama Bin laden advocates war on the USA and its allies who attack Iraq and or support Israel. Beside the fact Bin Laden has nothing to do with Iraq. Bin Laden is a bad guy but he does not come close to the attrocities committed by the Nazis. Read some more.
2006-09-08 14:12:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
HITLER. He had control of a whole nation, killed half of it without so much as a "please stop" from the international community, AND he had taken over a good deal of Europe BEFORE people seemed to realize he was a crazy mutha fukka.
Also, I think Hitler is smarter than Osama.
2006-09-08 13:24:58 · answer #5 · answered by Lotus Phoenix 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hitler
A million dead Jews vs. a few thousand Americans.
Bin Laden is the most cowardly though. Uses conscripts and children as bomb couriers.
2006-09-08 13:30:47 · answer #6 · answered by edozedo 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
They are both worst, in term of war... but they do!! these worst thing, with their own principles and ideas,
for them this principles and idea will be good in the future, for their own people... like western and others,, they have principles and ideas that they think are good for their country..thats why they counter attack for the wosrt done by these two leaders..
the conqueror of the past are worst than these two men....
2006-09-08 14:43:44 · answer #7 · answered by ruru1971coldwar 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush
2006-09-08 13:25:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I actually cannot believe you are asking such a stupid, offensive question. Millions of people died at the hands of Hitler, and millions more to at the hands of bin Laden. Grow up, and stop asking such disgusting questions.
2006-09-08 13:24:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hitler was responsible for a lot more death than Osama. Suffice it to say they are/were both very evil men.
2006-09-08 13:24:20 · answer #10 · answered by Akkakk the befuddled 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋