Because there is none at all. Anynoe who thinks that is just dumb. That includes Bushlickers. Even William Cohen, Clinton's defense secretary. He was a secret Bush supporter, and probably planned the stolen election. Because he said in testimony before Congress that "Al Qaeda also forged alliances with the National Islamic Front in the Sudan and with the government of Iran and its associated terrorist group Hezbollah for the purpose of working together against their perceived common enemies in the West, particularly the United States. In addition, al Qaeda reached an understanding with the government of Iraq that al Qaeda would not work against that government and that on particular projects, specifically including weapons development, al Qaeda would work cooperatively with the government of Iraq."
But then Cohen, the secret Bush supporting Chimp follower, said in testimony before Congress on why Clinton bombed the aspirin factory in Sudan:
2006-09-08
06:05:14
·
6 answers
·
asked by
BrianthePigEatingInfidel
4
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
"bin Laden had been living [at the plant], that he had, in fact, money that he had put into this military industrial corporation, that the owner of the plant had traveled to Baghdad to meet with the father of the VX program."
He said that if the plant had been allowed to produce VX that was used to kill thousands of Americans, people would have asked him, " 'You had a manager that went to Baghdad; you had Osama bin Laden, who had funded, at least the corporation, and you had traces of [VX precursor] and you did what? And you did nothing?' Is that a responsible activity on the part of the secretary of defense?"
2006-09-08
06:05:35 ·
update #1
So, not only is there no link between Saddam and al Qaeda, we should hunt down Clinton's secretary of defense and expose him for what he is!
2006-09-08
06:06:57 ·
update #2