2006-09-08 05:46:46 · 13 answers · asked by dstr 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
headed by civilians with back grounds in engineering,science, and military preparedness. Not political apointees
2006-09-08 05:48:38 · update #1
jamie
that was a white wash or all these lingering questions would not still be there would they?
2006-09-08 05:49:42 · update #2
Of course, there are too many issues left unaddressed, such as the collapse of WTC 7, the presence of molten metal in the basements of the buildings, and the strange coincidence of the floor evacuations and pull out of the security in the weeks leading up to the mass murder. It is not pleasant to believe that a group of Americans participated in this event in any way, but it would appear to be a possibility. I would like to see every question answered and have a realistic explanation for the fall of WTC 7, until this happens, I have doubts that I should not have to have. Hopefully, alternate explanations will be ruled out by hard science, but if this is not possible to achieve, then the guilty parties need to see their day in court.
2006-09-08 05:55:06 · answer #1 · answered by Tristansdad 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I for one agree with you one hundred percent, dstr dear!
The victims involved in the 9/11 holocaust were not mainly Americans but people from all parts of the world. So, the whole incident indeed deserves investigation by a body independent of USA. Also, those suspects rotting behind bars for the last five years should also be tried in an International Court of Law outside America!
2006-09-08 05:53:37 · answer #2 · answered by Sami V 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What we need is an independent investigation on the Policies implemented after 9/11. Were they based on fact or propoganda? www.impeachbush.org
Here is the link to the finding of the one you ask for though.
2006-09-08 05:50:23 · answer #3 · answered by Wilson Wilson 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I believe so. Either that or at least an addition to the report, answering question which was never fully answered by people who had family affected during 9/11. I think we owe them that much.
2006-09-08 06:11:11 · answer #4 · answered by choyryu 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The 9/11 Commission was independent, is another one required? I have not heard any serious credible criticism of their report.
2006-09-08 05:49:49 · answer #5 · answered by kearneyconsulting 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There has already been one. It was called the 9/11 Commission.
2006-09-08 05:48:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
That's so funny that one moron answered "so we really know what happened", even though we already have the 9/11 commission report. What he/she really wants is another commission that will come back with the report he/she wants, not the truth.
2006-09-08 05:49:44 · answer #7 · answered by Racist Beaner 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely.
2006-09-08 05:47:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We already had one. But the Democrats covered-up much of the findings.
Clinton and the Dems would sabotage it again.
They have to, or they would be destroyed.
2006-09-08 05:50:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Umm... we already did and the Bush administration completely trashed it as invalid because it contradicted what they had previously said.
2006-09-08 05:50:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋