should i start clinton portis/ rudi johnson, or tatum bell/ rudi johnson since portis might not play
2006-09-08 05:40:01 · 7 answers · asked by justlaxn11 1 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
Portis is unlikely to contribute much. Betts is likely to start at the very least. Portis may be a week or 2 away from starting.
Rudi should have a very nice week.
Go with Tatum Bell. Even if Mike Bell is the starter, Tatum will get at least 15 carries. The game could be a track meet, but only because Denver is tops in the league against the run. Look for STL to keep it close for a while, leaving both Bell boys to bang away at their defense deep into the game.
2006-09-08 06:22:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I live near DC and the word I have is that Portis himself is not optimistic about starting. Gibbs said it would be up to Portis, don't count on him starting. I say, if possible pickup Betts, he will be the starter if Portis is not. Ducket may get some carries but he hasn't had time to learn the O yet.
2006-09-08 16:04:42 · answer #2 · answered by bigjim6201 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Portis doesn't play, then you should start Tatum Bell (even though Mike Bell is the actual starter in Denver).
2006-09-08 12:42:12 · answer #3 · answered by Poopie Johnson 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bell and Johnson...Portis doesn't look like he's going to play.
2006-09-08 15:14:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would chose tatum bell for sure...even if portis was going to play that doesn't mean he will make it thru the whole game and i doubt he will see much playing time...i think bell is a great choice...denver is all about running in their offence...gl!
2006-09-08 13:20:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
portis
2006-09-08 16:38:30 · answer #6 · answered by Larry 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
don't play portis.
2006-09-08 12:45:21 · answer #7 · answered by Huck 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋