did saddaam try to hurt bush's daddy? is bush trying to finish was Bush Sr couldnt finish himself? OIL? i think the greater danger is in afghanistan and pakistan, but there is no oil there.....
2006-09-08 05:21:13 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
sorry, but bush even said there is no link to Saddaam and 9/11 - but there is proof OBL had a hand in it, why would he disband the unit looking him, and also say he doesnt care, he doesnt spend that much time on the subject (of finding him)
2006-09-08 07:02:47 · update #1
It was done so we could make a new nation that would be grateful to us for liberating them and would graciously refuse to participate in OPEC and would make the U.S. a favored nation in oil trade. DUH!
2006-09-08 06:57:19 · answer #1 · answered by Speedo Inspector 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Given that most of the 911 hijackers were saudis, it was an obvious move to attack afghanistan and then iraq to make way for secure oil pipelines from russia to the sea.
Once this has been achieved (doesnt matter how many thousands have to die for this) then dependency on saudi should be reduced sufficiently so that the warmongering paranoid psychotics that run your country can then have go at them.
2006-09-08 05:30:01 · answer #2 · answered by Old Cynic 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The problem with your question is that it based on a false premise. The evidence is in and Sadaam was working in conjunction with Osama bin Laden.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/04/27/walq27.xml&sSheet=/news/2003/04/27/ixnewstop.html
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/527uwabl.asp
The ties are factual. The evidence is clear.
The problem with the war in Iraq is not that we went to war, but that the war has been poorly executed. The majority of Americans supported the war in Iraq in its infant stages. But as time has gone on, support has wained. Unfortunately, the American public has become an MTV generation and the average attention span is less than 30 seconds.
The plan to remove Sadaam from power was appropriate. The plan to secure Iraq was lacking and flawed.
2006-09-08 05:32:56 · answer #3 · answered by erictompkins1970 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Baby talk from a liberal. Figures.
Ok Lib here is the clue bat again...
Sadam financed terrorists. Lots of terrorists. Terrorists connected all around the world.
Sadam provided the banking for terrorists.
Sadam killed Iranians with poison gas during the Iraq / Iran war.
Sadam killed Kurds with poison gas during the Iraq / Iran war.
Sadam was seeking nerve gas and biological weapons.
Saddam was seeking atomic weapons.
Sadams atomic scientists (working in Libya) were exposed and Libya was told, throw them out and close the labs or die. Sadams scientists were thrown out and the atomic project was stopped.
Question for you? How much oil have we stollen from the Iraqis since we have been there? CLUE: Not one drop.
Go back to your baby talk Lib it's your style.
2006-09-08 05:55:43 · answer #4 · answered by Zee HatMan 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
To the person that said there was a Saddam Al Queda link.
My 2006 article trumps your 2003.
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/09/08/iraqreport.ap/index.html
2006-09-08 06:10:31 · answer #5 · answered by amatukaze 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because Bush is unable to think on his own because he's been pampered his entire life and has had all of his decisions made for him.
When you have this type of man in power who is unable to process information, who is surrounded by intelligent power hungry sharks, vultures and others who have their own personal agendas this is what you get.
2006-09-08 05:33:11 · answer #6 · answered by Pam 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because Bush is stupid and just wanted to make his "mark"
2006-09-08 05:23:51 · answer #7 · answered by island3girl 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
why is that muslim countrys are the danger???
2006-09-08 05:27:29 · answer #8 · answered by Carefree? Noway! I wish! 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋