Relevant? try OBSOLETE. unless you wish to continue lining the pockets of thieves.
2006-09-08 04:58:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by KnightZone 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't know you tell me...they repeatedly have their resolutions ignored by countries, they failed in So. Lebanon 5 years ago which lead to the recent Israel-Hezbollah war, they have "stared down" Iran multiple times over its nuclear bomb plan, only to practically be laughed at, they are totally ignoring the situation in the Darfur region of the Sudan...think about this- the UN was formed after WW2 to try to stop the amount of war in the world...since 1950 has the world been more peaceful or filled w/ more war and conflict? The UN has no leverage at all to make any real impact on this world.
2006-09-08 11:59:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by james p 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
The United Nations actively pursues anti-American policies and appeases America's enemies, while being largely funded by $3 billion worth of annual American dues. After revealing the depth of rampant corruption in the UN, it is time to recognize the changes in Old Europe and redesign America's alliances that line up with America's national interests.
If John Kerry and Hillary Clinton have their way, Kofi Annan and Jacques Chirac will gain veto power over American foreign policy. Scared? You should be. It could happen. And in Inside the Asylum, former deputy undersecretary of defense Jed Babbin shows just how it could happen and why the UN deserves the nickname "The Asylum."
In the Asylum...
* the UN assists international terrorists. Babbin exposes the shocking links between the UN and terrorist organizations.
* The money trail from the UN to Saddam Hussein. It is time to rip the veil from the outrageous Oil-for-Food program-proving that the UN sold its moral legitimacy for oil, stuffed its own pockets at the expense of the Iraqi people, and undermined American pressure on Saddam Hussein: the UN's cash cow. The UN's Oil-for-Food program, provided Saddam Hussein with the means to bribe politicians, to deprive his people of needed food and medicine, and to literally steal billions of dollars. There is even emerging evidence that money from the program might have gone to support al-Qaeda.
• The UN's raid on the American Treasury: dominated by Third World staffers who consider the United States Treasury "the common heritage of mankind." Kofi Annan, the UN secretary-general, is an anti-American moral relativist who misses no opportunity to arrogate power from the United States to the UN.
* The United Nations and the European Union are morally bankrupt-and open enemies of the United States. France and the United Nations have cost American lives in Iraq by their perverse delaying of American action in the Iraq War. American troops are fighting and dying today because of a terrorist strategy Saddam Hussein developed while France and the United Nations delayed Operation Iraqi Freedom.
The UN is more of an international criminal than a dispenser of legitimate international law. If America wants to retain its sovereignty and security, it's time to escape from the UN asylum and say goodbye to the false friends of Old Europe. We owe no tribute to the UN and the EU, We should not be ashamed and divided to look after our own defense."
The United Nations building in Manhattan is an international enclave, no longer American territory. Inside the Asylum is a powerful argument that it's time to reclaim that land for America.
2006-09-08 14:27:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
More relevant than your spelling. The U.S. used Saddam's refusal to comply with U.N. sanctions as part of the reason for war. Back in the 70's the U.N. made statements against Isreal and the U.S. I guess it all depends on where you are sitting.
2006-09-08 11:59:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by doggiebike 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
The UN is impotent and anti-semitic. They shouldn't be relevant.
2006-09-08 11:58:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
try to be relevant on our Language. then we talk about UN
2006-09-08 12:09:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by adraya 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
in no way shape or form. they are afraid to offend any country.
2006-09-08 11:56:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by chkibo2000 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes it is.
2006-09-08 11:59:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by Adnan Sallam 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
no
2006-09-08 12:00:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by ssgtusmc3013 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
no
2006-09-08 11:58:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by knu 4
·
1⤊
0⤋