1. Another Ramsey (Mom, Dad, or her Brother).
2. John Karr
3. An outsider
2006-09-08 04:51:53 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
1= most likely
2= Nope, but hot
3= highly unlikley
2006-09-08 05:26:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
1+2=3
2006-09-08 04:54:49 · answer #2 · answered by droid 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i imagine it replaced into an interloper.. probably a foreigner or a member of a sadistic pedophilia crew. I say that in accordance to intuitive ingenious and prescient more desirable than authentic deduction. i know that what Patsy did in cleansing the evidence replaced into extraordinarily suspicious and unhelpful, yet in her own extraordinarily despairing ideas on the time, thinking how some each body is type of conservative neatfreaks /niceknicks (no longer understanding if she replaced into or no longer) i'll honestly see the cleansing taking position quote unquote innocently. it may also be a way of psychological denial of reality, hiding from the international. It replaced right into a terrribly unhappy ingredient for all.
2016-11-25 20:39:43 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know that any one will ever find out who.I said from day one when they picked up John Karr that he didn't do it he was a wacko and that 's all , I would like to say maybe to the parents and an outsider is more to my choosing.the brother now that might be the one.
2006-09-08 04:55:56 · answer #4 · answered by Louisa R 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think it was her parents. Her DNA test results were never revealed. Her body found in house, parents moving out of the house after her death etc......doesnt make sense that it was an outsider. If u study human psychology and go thru the series of events after her death, u will figure out the answer. Why 10 years and still it remains a mystery?? Parents never demanded anything, why??
2006-09-08 05:39:13 · answer #5 · answered by Alpha 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Personally, I believe that anyone interested in this case should not be writing and pointing a finger at anyone in her family. It could be considered libel, and treated as such, if the known identies could be proven, which they could be with a court order. Yahoo would have to give out this personal information. So, please be careful what you say on these Q&A's. If more readers would be aware of this procedure, I believe you'd be a bit more cautious with your replies.
2006-09-08 05:23:21 · answer #6 · answered by skyeblue 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Seems logical that it was a family member but a botched investigation by the Bouder DA & Police means we will never know...
2006-09-08 05:00:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
she was a little girl with an adults face, made up with a lot of makeup and she was made to act like a grown woman. i personally believe it doesnt matter who killed her b/c if they hadnt killed her, the experience of the beauty pageant would have messed her up emotionally altogether. a little girl should not have been placed in the situation she was.
2006-09-08 04:54:13 · answer #8 · answered by california gurlie poo 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Like any investigation you start with the immediate family.
2006-09-08 04:59:11 · answer #9 · answered by what?????? 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It wasn't Karr of course.
I'd have to know who was in the home in the days prior to her disappearance to be able to answer that.
2006-09-08 04:57:54 · answer #10 · answered by ? 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋