English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Comments by non-biased analyst on various cable news stations have suggested that this docu drama is top heavy with conservative stratergist to undermind the democratic push for victory in the november elections. How can such a controversial subject as the 911 attack be poltiicized with false non substantuated propaganda be allowed to air? This is a clear intention by the Conservative biased media to create a negitive democratic atmosphere prior to a very important and possibly pivotal election. Should ABC's responsibility to being truthfull to the American Public be held to the fire? Will ABC be subject to slanderous lawsuits, or a possible court order to stop the airing of this ficticious anti democrat production. With the November elections becoming a benchmark for a possible turn around in U.S. Policies both Global and domestic, a lot may ride on the public's ability to seperate fact from propagandized fiction.

2006-09-08 04:44:26 · 15 answers · asked by James c 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

15 answers

ABC helping conservatives? Are you kidding?

ABC wants ratings, and if sawing against the political grain of their audience causes the most buzz, they're going to go for it.

So far I have not seen the "offensive" content, but I doubt it will be as bad as people fear. As far as taking blame for 9/11, there's some to go around for everyone in the Federal Government from BOTH administrations.

If the Dems want momentum, they're going to have to generate it themselves with something new, something positive, something that looks like leadership. A TV show isn't going to affect anything

2006-09-08 04:52:21 · answer #1 · answered by n0witrytobeamused 6 · 1 0

Since when is the media all Conservative. I thought most of the media was Liberal. If you are getting your info from CNN, then yes they will say that it is too Conservative. It probably has something to do with painting Clinton into the picture and Liberals do not like that. I believe that all the government is at fault, whether they are Democrat or Republican. It was a break down of intelligence all the way through the ranks. The showing now probably has something to do with this being the 5th anniversary of 9/11. I am wondering, do you think the government did this so that Bush could grab more power or do you think the government allowed to happen so Bush could grab more power? Do you think Bush paid Bin Laden to do this? This was planned so far in advance, that if Gore would have been President, he would have had to deal with this and the Conservatives would have tried to find conspiracies.

2006-09-08 05:18:12 · answer #2 · answered by kepjr100 7 · 0 1

The new ABC Doca Drama-condemning Penis Clinton's responsibility for Bin Laden's attacks on the USA-is a right thing on the right time. Those attacks resulted from the bitterness of Muslims over wars against Iraq, which were started by the Father, the Son & Peyronie's Disease, combined with the encouragement Islamic terrorists got from their evil policy in former Yugoslavia.

2006-09-08 04:52:57 · answer #3 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 0 1

Interesting how all of the liberals are bent out of shape because their poster boy "Big Willie Clinton" is cast in a negative light. Did you all forget about the great piece of fiction entitled "Fahernheit 9/11". Can anyone tell me the purpose of this film or its conveniently schedules release date?

And for the record, this will not be the first time that Disney has caved to pressure. "Pearl Harbor" was re-edited so as to not offend the Japanese, even though they bombed the hell out of Hawaii.

And frankly, if you are dim witted enough to buy into any of the garbage that is produced by "Hollywood", then you probably shouldn't be voting in the November elections anyway.

2006-09-08 05:39:16 · answer #4 · answered by erictompkins1970 2 · 0 1

so your judging it prior to watching it for yourself? nothing like the rock solid Fahrenheit 911 right. your problem is ABC is not calling it a documentary its a Minni series that starts with the 93 world trade center bombing and leads to 911. as far as i know Clinton was president the majority of that time. as far as being a right wing propaganda film from what i heard Richard Clarke looks like a hero in this film and the right thinks hes an idiot.

2006-09-08 05:02:57 · answer #5 · answered by rmisbach 4 · 0 0

You made your own point it is fictionalized. It is not meant to be a 100% accurate portrayal of the 9/11 Commission report. And why was there a completely opposite reaction by the far left when CBS pulled "The Reagan's" off of the air prior to airing?

2006-09-08 04:49:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Religion, unfortunately. And because Romney acts so religious, he'll probably get a lot of votes from dumb Christians. Racism comes in second. Nobody actually cares about the facts anyways it seems. :/

2016-03-27 02:54:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Nonsense...
ABC is a pro liberal democrat news agency...
Liberals & Dems just don't want the American public reminded
of the truth of the matter this close to elections...

2006-09-08 04:51:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I guess it sucks when someone finally shows what really happened and the Dems started all the problems. And ABC is a Lib network.

2006-09-08 04:51:56 · answer #9 · answered by me 4 · 0 1

It seems the Republican wing is desperate and going crazy in the midst of their preparations for a celebration of utter defeat!

2006-09-08 04:48:50 · answer #10 · answered by Sami V 7 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers