2006-09-08 04:21:51 · 10 answers · asked by mikeygonebad 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It is likely to be Jeb Bush. Or , in order not to be too obvious about it, they are going to select Frist or some other criminal as intermediary until Jeb will be selected four years thereafter.
Even the dumbest cons must notice that elections are nothing but a show like the Superbowl in order to mimic democracy. This country has lost it's ways on 12/12/2000 when the supreme court selected Bush the winner. And we are supposed to be the cradle of democracy. We are nothing but a laughing stock.
2006-09-08 04:37:15 · answer #1 · answered by The answer man 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Jeb Bush 2008
2006-09-08 11:23:51 · answer #2 · answered by 43 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You know something? I work with Diebold a lot and I can guarantee you that they aren't competent enough to make a machine register a vote for one candidate as a vote for another on purpose. Please try another conspiracy.
2006-09-08 11:25:37 · answer #3 · answered by Crusader1189 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
DIEBOLD LIKES THE NEOCONS.
2006-09-08 11:26:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I dunno.
If you're convinced it's all a plot, then there's no reason to campaign or support a candidate.
So roll over and go back to bed.
If you bother to work for a candidate you're a hypocrite.
2006-09-08 11:23:35 · answer #5 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Whoever Haliburton tells them to.
2006-09-08 11:24:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
WARNING, TINFOILHAT ATTACK IN PROGRESS.
Darn them mental health clinics, when will they stop letting the patients post online?
2006-09-08 11:41:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Dick Cheney
2006-09-08 11:23:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Diebold... Are conspiracy theories as addictive as crack?
2006-09-08 11:23:53 · answer #9 · answered by John Skerry II 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋
http://www.investigate911.com/
2006-09-08 11:32:35 · answer #10 · answered by Kevin H 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋