Here's why (hope telling you this doesn't make you want to insult me)
1) The way he has directed the military has resulted in the capture of everyone involved in every aspect of the 9/11 attacks (except th ones that died)
2) He has surrounded himself with people who have proven that they can produce results in the areas that they specialize in (i.e. Donald Rumsfeld)
3) He has morals and a clean lifestyle unlike Bill Clinton.
4) He visits the wounded soldiers at the hospital regularly
5) He is emotional and vulnerable.
2006-09-08 03:17:20 · 15 answers · asked by weluvgwbush 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Here is why he isn't
1. He never takes responsibility for his own actions
2. He hasn't got the clean lifestyle you want us to believe (he is a drug addict and alcoholic)
3. He has bought his way (with his fathers help) to where he is today.
4. He bombs innocent people
5. He isn't after terrorists he is after oil
And this is only a few reasons WHY he isn't a great president. But I don't hate you if you live in denial.....thats your choice.
2006-09-08 03:30:28 · answer #1 · answered by lollipoppett2005 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Resulted in the capture of everyone involved in 9/11???? You've got to be kidding me! If that were true, why don't we have bin laden right now??? remember how your beloved president said that we would catch him dead or alive? We can all see how that panned out! He's too busy trying to be mr. nice guy who doesn't have the balls to tell pakistan that we're going to get him with or without their help. Morals and a clean lifestyle? you need to seriously do some research on bush and rethink your thoughts because he has never had morals and a clean lifestyle. A true Christian would tell you that nobody is supposed to judge, that is only God's job, but yet he's trying to take away women's right to choose what is best for their bodies, trying to outlaw gay marriage when it's nobody's business what they do with their lives, and he snorted coke and was an alcoholic. And he's a liar! He lied to the people about going into iraq and just now, 3 years later, is he coming out and saying that they posed NO THREAT to the U.S. Iraq didn't have any WMD's but he said that they did and all they found were "traces" of wmd's that were once there. If they had wmd's don't you think we would've found them by now?? Oh yeah, he's got morals all right. He visits wounded soldiers at the hospital regularly? Please!!! he's too busy taking undeserved vacation after undeserved vacation. Being emotional and vulnerable at the same time are a bad combination because being both at the same time takes away your sense of logic and common sense. If we would have went after bush like they did clinton, we would've found bin laden by now. You and a whole bunch of other people need to do a lot of research and stop living your lives with rose-colored glasses on.
2006-09-08 05:20:38 · answer #2 · answered by cwilson_192002 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That was about the most Republican you can get.
1) If he wasn't being nosey and trying to finish what his father started there wouldn't have been a 9/11!!!
2) Just because someone specializes in something doesn't mean they produce results. Maybe their real specialization is making it look like they produce results.
3) Yeah his morals poured all onto his twins right? He is a man(meaning person not GOD) just like Bill Clinton neither are perfect, and just because he hasn't got caught doesn't mean he doesn't do anything.
4) That is good PR!!! And its kind of his fault they are in the situation they are in.
5) Once again he is man EVERYONE is emotional and vulnerable at some point in their lives.
Just my thoughts please don't take it personal. We just had a talk like this in my Government & Politics class last night
2006-09-08 03:39:53 · answer #3 · answered by Just Me!!! 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
1. GW gave up on trying to capture Al Qaeda pretty much the same day we rolled into Kabul. The major leaders are still at large.
2. Rumsfeld punishes those who disagree with his point of view even when Donny knows he’s in the wrong (i.e., intelligence officers planning the Iraqi invasion).
3. GW raped the entire nation of Iraq even when he knew it was not a threat to the US. He sends US soldiers to die for his own fantasy. Give me a fornicator any time.
4. Like all presidents, he has an obligation to meet with the people he sends to uphold his will. Too bad GW sent so many kids to Iraq (I’ll grant you that Afghanistan was necessary), which he knew was never a threat, that he now has to visit them with great regularity.
5. I’d be pretty ashamed of myself too with a record like GW.
2006-09-08 03:31:56 · answer #4 · answered by Eric G 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
you're in basic terms getting your self right into a pissing contest. Time to allow bypass of the gangster mentality. both activities are operating as a crew to break the country. Whom ever comes after BHO, will proceed the ball rolling, a useless ringer for Bush continued Clinton's stride. stop being a lemming, and attempt to have an unique concept. there is the position the problem is, no human being thinks for themselves any extra.
2016-11-06 21:47:52 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Does it change my opinion of you? No... but do I think you have your head so far up your a** you'll never find light? Yes. So tell me again how he has found everyone connected with 9/11 again? when last month we had people ready to board at least 10 more airplanes heading for the US? 85% of are troops are in the wrong damn country dying for his daddy's war which has NOTHING to do with 9/11. Do yourself a favor and even though it is really one sided to some extent... rent 'Fahrenheit 9-11' and then post this question again
2006-09-08 05:06:22 · answer #6 · answered by Just Wondering 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
1 then why is bin laden still walking around a free man
2what has donald rumsfekd produced besides the civil war in Iraq, or is that it
3he is a drunk, and everybody knows it
4yes they are good photo ops
5 at least Iraq has wiped that arrogant smurk off his face
now if this is insulting to you, I'm so very sorry, but someone has to state the truth
2006-09-08 20:10:54 · answer #7 · answered by acid tongue 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did he surround himself with proven Fema workers when all those people died and lost their homes during Hurricane Katrina or did he let them drown in there own filth. Did he send his kids, nieces,nephews, or friends sons or daughters to Iraq to be killed "for the cause". I didn't know he captured everyone involved with 9/11 maybe those bad guys should have hide wit Bin La din!
This doesn't change my opinion of you, your just another American who doesn't mind Bush taping her phone.
2006-09-08 03:54:11 · answer #8 · answered by Honey Bee 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yes he sure directed the military with his extensive career in the military.
Yes he surround his himself with leftovers from Bush#1 like Cheney and Misfield.
Man of morals yes compassion for rich to hell with the middle class.
Photo ops at the hospital for his ego.
Lacks emotion.
2006-09-08 03:27:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Attacking other countries isn't moral and of course he should visit the soldiers at the hospital - he caused them to be there.
2006-09-08 03:22:25 · answer #10 · answered by tomleah_06 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋