Would that make the evengelicals happy?
I mean it is the gay capitol of the world.
2006-09-08 02:53:50 · 15 answers · asked by abascious 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Good grief. No we should not.
2006-09-08 02:56:52 · answer #1 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Well it might be the gay capital but it's only in a couple neighborhoods. North Beach is a heterosexual area which includes the wharf, Telegraph Hill, the Italian section, Chinatown, etc. San Francisco is too beautiful to destroy. Linda
2006-09-08 10:04:04 · answer #2 · answered by Linda 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No it is the target of the terroist groups and slated for a nuclear bomb soon . Just wait a few more years and it will be gone . Pray to Jesus that they die quickly and with as little suffering as possible .
Well that does not make sense seeing is how they will burn in hell for all eternity . Suffering is what God is all about .Hell fire and damnation is upon all those who do not follow my will . THE LORD givith and the LORD takith away .
I am glad God is a myth created to steal from idiots who can not tie thier shoes without help .
2006-09-08 10:03:07 · answer #3 · answered by playtoofast 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You know what, I oppose same sex marriage, I really can't understand the "Gay" thing, but if there Americans, and supporting the troops, and do their thing in their own bedroom, save the firebomb for some terrorist capital in the Middle-East.
2006-09-08 10:02:40 · answer #4 · answered by Fitforlife 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it would make anyone happy. The true strength of our country is that this behavior is tolerated at all. Ever hear about the "Gay Capitol" of any Muslim country? They would be beheaded.
2006-09-08 10:03:28 · answer #5 · answered by Kelly T 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why stop at San Fransisco? Why not let the religious bigots destroy the who country and we can start all over again.
2006-09-08 10:47:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I really like San Fransisco. I think mustard gas would be better than firebombing. Then it would just be all the people that would disappear, not the redwoods, Napa, or the nice bay views.
2006-09-08 09:56:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
perhaps criminalizing promiscuous sodomy
would be easier and more conducive to public health.
contact the lovely california senator
Barbara Boxer
(202) 224-3553
and Gov. Schwarzenegger
(916) 445-2841
2006-09-08 10:13:26 · answer #8 · answered by redreverser 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It may make some of them happy. Only the ones filled with the garbage of the devil's world though.
2006-09-08 09:59:45 · answer #9 · answered by El Pistolero Negra 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Shouldn't we learn to spell it first? I mean I would hate to bomb the wrong place.
2006-09-08 10:01:23 · answer #10 · answered by edozedo 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2006-09-08 09:59:37 · answer #11 · answered by ooooooohenry 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋