why does the left feel they are entitled to CENSOR free speech and a movie?

Question

this is a violation of the constitution.

Answer 1

The left never censors free speech, unless it shows them in a bad light, then they are all for it and how dare anyone call them on it. They are, after all, morally bankrupt hypocrites.

Answer 2

The beauty of free speech is that a movie can be made and people can speak out against it or for it. If there is some sort of court ruling stating that the contents much be changed, that is violation of free speech. But as far as I've heard, Clinton and his team are just complaining.

Answer 3

There's a substantial difference between a letter-writing campaign asking a station not to air a show, and a law forbidding it.

I am fine with the first (and certainly conservatives used it opposing the movie on Reagan), but absolutely opposed to the second.

I believe everyone, even ill-informed radicals and idiot racists, have the right to speak their minds. The rest of us, however, have the right to tell TV stations that we're not going to watch them anymore if they give such folks airtime. That's the other side of free speech.

Answer 4

I think that the propaganda piece, "Path to 9/11" should be shown in it's entirety AFTER the November elections. It is obvious that this cheesy manipulated pile of crap was created and funded by the the right-wing to sway the electorate (not all that sophisticated to begin with) to vote for candidates who support the Bush regime's rape of America. That ABC would participate in such a sham seems to indicate that they have either been intimidated or infiltrated by the fascist elements trying to totally control America for their own benefit.

Answer 5

Your question is a little ambiguous. Do you mean the liberals in America? They are strong advocates of freedom of speech and media. Its the conservatives who are advocating checks on freedom to ensure security.

If you mean Communists then the basis on their entire ideology is wrong on the fact that they accept the "Dictatorship of the Proletariat" an unaccountable form of government, which is an intermediate state until the dream of classless and stateless society is realized.

Answer 6

do you think this movie is intended to teach the audience about the ACTUAL events leading to 9/11, or is it intended to illustrate a dramatic, theoretical, half-truth, propagandist illustration of the path leading to 9/11?

i think the objection is that one may confuse these two very different scenarios, and that the station would be acting irresponsibly if they didn't clearly inform which, of the above cases, this movie represents to the viewing public.

Answer 7

Because it's the only way they can convinced the "sheep" in America they're way is the best. If everyone heard the other way then they would know liberalism sucks and is destroying America. "Sheep" is everyone that doesn't know what's going on in the first place. They just follow the leader of the pack.

Answer 8

That is the only way they can still exist, If you keep the masses
ignorant you can control them. Just look around, there are kooks
still around with Kerry bumper stickers.

Answer 9

Anything that is on network tv can't be taken seriously. The same goes for pissypants liberals.

Answer 10

If you're referring to the anti-Clinton rightwing smear job posing as a documentary that ABC/Disney wants to air this weekend, then read on:

http://americablog.blogspot.com/2006/09/...
Disney/ABC flat-out REFUSED to provide Pres. Clinton, Madeleine Albright and Sandy Berger copies of its 9/11 "docudrama", tho GOP bloggers got copies

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/06/abc-...
ABC Insider Assures Right-Wing Bloggers: ‘The Message of the Clinton Admin Failures Remains Fully Intact’


http://mediamatters.org/items/2006090100...
Right wing uses ABC docudrama to push debunked claim blaming Clinton administration for 9-11

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/07/fbi-...
FBI Agent Who Consulted On Path to 9/11 Quit Halfway Through Because ‘They Were Making Things Up’

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/...
Factual errors in Path to 9/11

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/con...
More factual errors in Path to 9/11

http://mediamatters.org/items/2006090700...
ABC's Path to 9/11 partly based on information from Bush administration PR official

Source(s):

If ABC insists on airing this propaganda, it's probably time to boycott.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brent-budo...