English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

38 answers

The section after "if" is wrong, so the overall answer is NO!

2006-09-08 01:42:27 · answer #1 · answered by AlphaOne_ 5 · 5 0

I love questions like this did you ask it to see how many people called you pathetic? Anyhow in the spirit of yahoo I will answer... If a woman's main function was to have children then alcohol probably should be made illegal but in the same vein as a woman needs a man to get pregnant and it can have negative effects on male sperm count then men shouldn't be allowed it either. However a woman's role in society is not just a baby making machine as you probably well know (you are just being a wind up merchant) therefore no, women should be allowed to drink and dance and go out by themselves after dark all the things you would probably like to ban!

2006-09-08 02:54:14 · answer #2 · answered by suzi 3 · 0 0

That's looking at it from a very biological point of view. Biologically speaking, humans are capable of having children by their early teens, once a man and a woman have got together and had two children they have replaced themselves on the planet, ensuring the propagation of the species, and are now worthless, so the sooner they die, the better.

But we're so much more than biological entities now. We don't just eat, defaecate, sleep and have sex. With society and civilisation, self awareness, likes and dislikes, entertainment and pleasure we can lead lives with purposes other than our biological ones.

So if you want to get pregnant, the fact that drinking decreases fertility is a biological factor that you should bear in mind. If you want to have fun and you get your pleasure out of drinking, then go ahead. Passing a law to maintain womens' fertility would oppress those for whom life is not about fertility.

2006-09-08 02:03:26 · answer #3 · answered by reddragon105 3 · 0 0

One women's main function is not just to give birth. Some women choose not to have kids, others cant have kids unless they adopt. Women are more then capable of doing more then giving birth.

It decreases fertility huh? Then maybe it should be illegal for men too since it may lower their sperm count.

I think what ever it is you are on haves caused some interference with oxygen getting to your brain causing you ask a really lame question.

2006-09-08 01:45:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

We are not machines, we are not Functional to human race, please. Women have no "main function", as in a wash machine's main function is to keep your clothing clean.

Or i should tell then than if Men's main function is to procreate, then they should not get involved in dangerous activities that may harm your testicles....,

which by the way if a Man drinks excesively, it may also affect the baby...

It as decision of a Woman and a Man to have a child, it is NO main function.......

So the Answer is NO.

2006-09-08 02:11:21 · answer #5 · answered by Dussygirl 3 · 0 0

Why do you think its their main function Trevor? A woman can't conceive a child without a man and drinking also decreases a mans sperm count. Should drinking be made illegal to men too? Seing as how we NEED them to have babies?

2006-09-08 01:50:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

That falls under civil rights and as a mother I think that it should be a law but unfortunately its not but I do believe that the father not drink or smoke during that time. Just so that is fair to all including the unborn child

2006-09-11 18:46:39 · answer #7 · answered by Kristy C 1 · 0 0

Where did you ever get the idea that a woman's main functions was to give birth.

2006-09-09 12:58:55 · answer #8 · answered by Cali Girl 5 · 0 0

If men main function is to make money to support the woman-mother and the children at home, what are you doing waisting your time asking but earning the bread and copulating with your wife.
You must be homosexual.

2006-09-08 01:50:46 · answer #9 · answered by Expat Froggy 3 · 1 0

Finally, someone tells me what my main function is! And here I thought it was to be a productive member of society. Turns out I should be a baby making machine!

2006-09-08 01:44:08 · answer #10 · answered by empress_pam 4 · 6 0

That's a pretty pre-historic view of the main function of women.

2006-09-08 01:46:55 · answer #11 · answered by Eric H 4 · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers