2006-09-08 01:34:38 · 13 answers · asked by john p 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think that the propaganda piece, "Path to 9/11" should be shown in it's entirety AFTER the November elections. It is obvious that this cheesy manipulated pile of crap was created and funded by the the right-wing to sway the electorate (not all that sophisticated to begin with) to vote for candidates who support the Bush regime's rape of America. That ABC would participate in such a sham seems to indicate that they have either been intimidated or infiltrated by the fascist elements trying to totally control America for their own benefit.
2006-09-08 03:25:40 · answer #1 · answered by iknowtruthismine 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They take an emotionally charged event and add fiction (they admitted to that) in order to make it more dramatically. Well knowing that their lies will impact politics they are not shying away from that. But then again, why should they since it is the intention of the GOP and Bush's cousin who is a big whig at ABC.
2006-09-08 02:52:09 · answer #2 · answered by The answer man 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am not mad at ABC, however I think it is irresponsible to air a movie that is so bias's to blame one person or another for 911. ABC has said it is a dramatization of the events so in effect it is fiction. But many people will take it as fact and it will effect some or many voters. This is wrong. People bring up Micheal Moores movie, you had to pay to see that one and it was not as easy as just turn on the TV. I hope that America is smarter then to take this movie as fact, that they will access it fairly as entertainment and it will not cloud their judgment as voters, but I really fear that this won't happen.
2006-09-08 01:47:56 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Because it makes their hero - Bill Clinton - look bad. He was weak and indecisive on Bin Laden. That indecision, coupled with weak responses on the embassy bombings, the USS Cole, and the '92 attack on the World Trade Center - all those things emboldened Bin Laden.
He felt, because of the weak responses of the Clinton administration, that they could conduct a large scale attack (i.e. 9/11) on the U.S. - and do it with impunity.
The other thing that made Clinton look bad, is in the movie, he is distracted by the whole Monica Lewinsky affair - and spending his energy on that (not the actual affair with Lewinsky - the fallout from it) - rather than worrying about Bin Laden.
2006-09-08 02:06:26 · answer #4 · answered by Flint 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
ABC said that the 9/11 movie is base on the 9/11 commission report and thy say it not
2006-09-08 01:37:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Probably because they are never satisfied. They hate war but when ABC shows that they could have prevented it by killing Osama, they get pissed. If a "progressive" liberal were in the White House, do you think we would have went in to Afghanistan after Osama? They are also afraid that this kind of press that shows them as being weak will cost them votes in the upcoming election.
2006-09-08 01:38:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Maybe it is because ABC has finally saw the error of their ways and has decided to have, at least, a little "slanted to the right" airing time. We shall see.
2006-09-08 02:34:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
A documentary is supposed to be truth. This is not and they admit it, but many people will never hear that side. If you want Hollywood make up a fairy tail. If you want to make a documentary stick to the facts.
2006-09-08 01:50:08 · answer #8 · answered by jackie 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because the truth is coming out .
2006-09-08 01:56:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because the liberal media is not supposed to pick on them. It's against the rules. It's kind of like having your own dog bite you.
2006-09-08 01:36:42 · answer #10 · answered by Colorado 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋